I was responding to a post on the 360 site last night from a FA wanting to know how they would get fed if they were hungry? I took it to reference the occasional FSM showing up with the company credit card and offering to go get the crew something to eat, most likely due to an unscheduled delay. This FA was wondering if the IAM would come running to bring them food?!? I have not responded to any of the posts on that site, not sure why I chose to break my silence last night other than I couldn't "let it go". It was suggested that I repost so here goes...
I remember getting "real" crew meals all the time under our previous contracts. They were the same meals as FC and most of them were "hot" entrees with a full set-up tray,... Though, I do also remember many FAs asking for a "healthier" version e.g..salads, etc. (can't please everyone🙂 That being said, as a "grown-up" and as a prepared "mom", I have a "stash" in my bag, "nourishment" in the case of unexpected delays, or perhaps in the case that the offered meal that doesn't fit my dietary needs. Under the contract, I knew when and what I would be getting and by choice, I could decline and bring my own. And, in any circumstance, I still would carry nuts, granola, soup packets, because there is always the chance that something might disrupt the schedule.
Did my Union Dues pay for unexpected interruptions in my schedule? Not necessarily, but sometimes the fact that I was guaranteed a meal after being on duty "x" number of hours without a chance to get nourishment, or if a meal was not catered, etc. there was compensation. Did that preclude the company from stepping up to the plate in an IROP situation?, not at all...most of the time there was an effort to get us food from an airport vendor as we waited through whatever unexpected delay was in front of us. It wasn't a contentious relationship, but one of respect, we weren't made to feel guilty for asking for assistance, and yet there was accountability to make it happen.
As a work force, we were team players. We, at times waived our rights to make an exception to the rule, however, since it was our "choice", it's ironic that there were fewer occasions that required us to make that choice. There in lies a lesson for many, when the rule book is in "black and white", there will be fewer occasions to ask for an exception. Exception being something that was due to an IROP or perhaps an individual's family crisis.
Can there be give and take? Yes, there always was under the contracts I enjoyed, but without the "fear" of retribution and retaliation. I rested much easier with the fact that I had a union to support me, much like I appreciate that fact that I have insurance to back me in the case of an an unexpected catastrophe or car accident, etc. So yes, I will choose "dues" over "shoes".....when and until then, we will not have that expense...and when we do...as in my past....those dues are tax deductible, just like the uniform expenses and such that I claim each year.
I didn't come from a union background, but I learned to appreciate the gifts I've have received from the efforts of those who struggled before me. Whether one has received those benefits as a first-born or is receiving them because they are a distant relative that happens to be in the industry, we should be grateful for those that have struggled and fought the good fight.....we have all benefitted from them. Can any mistakes on either side of the fence occur...of course...but that is what "side letters" are all about.
Any contract can be amended, improved upon, and additional enhancements can be implemented. The best part is that both parties have to agree, it can't be changed on a whim or to benefit just the administrative side. That's what Iam talking about.