WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2003
- Messages
- 21,709
- Reaction score
- 10,662
and it goes back DECADES, long before deregulation, long before Western, Pan Am, or Northwest.
It is a key means by which DL matches staffing with travel demand which is far from constant on a year round basis.
It is also the reason why DL's full-time employees have been able to be better paid and retain job security where other airlines have been unable to provide it.
those who find it offensive don't understand or refuse to accept the reasons for it - and are messing with their own job security and pay in order to push for their sense of equality - when those who work in RR or PT positions knew EXACTLY what they were agreeing to when they took those positions.
as much as some want to argue otherwise, the DL culture is a well-defined and well-tested formula that will come apart when labor starts trying to pull out pieces of the puzzle without being willing to give something else up.
Richard Anderson wasn't kidding nor was he mistaken that the Delta culture is well-established and cannot endure for workgroups that choose to unionize and attempt to force their own solutions instead of DL's formula that existed longer than any person on this forum has worked for or will work for DL.
the union mindset has been that they can push DL to give more and more on top of the fastest rates of compensation in the US airline industry - and well above most of the rest of US businesses as well.
Not only do DL employees who think they are going to push DL for more on their terms have virtually no negotiating power given the overall size of what DL is paying relative to competitors, but DL and no other company are candy store that employees can walk into to demand what they want on top of already very generous compensation.
Employees are a commodity just like fuel. Fuel doesn't talk back but it is a service.
Those DL employees who think they have the wisdom to redefine the way DL has succeeded for years might well find out that they are nothing more than a supplier or MRO that DL drops only to find another.
those are cold, hard words but they are ones that need to be spoken to those who arrogantly are convinced they know better than DL mgmt. and who think they can redefine a very successful strategy that has worked for decades.
It is a key means by which DL matches staffing with travel demand which is far from constant on a year round basis.
It is also the reason why DL's full-time employees have been able to be better paid and retain job security where other airlines have been unable to provide it.
those who find it offensive don't understand or refuse to accept the reasons for it - and are messing with their own job security and pay in order to push for their sense of equality - when those who work in RR or PT positions knew EXACTLY what they were agreeing to when they took those positions.
as much as some want to argue otherwise, the DL culture is a well-defined and well-tested formula that will come apart when labor starts trying to pull out pieces of the puzzle without being willing to give something else up.
Richard Anderson wasn't kidding nor was he mistaken that the Delta culture is well-established and cannot endure for workgroups that choose to unionize and attempt to force their own solutions instead of DL's formula that existed longer than any person on this forum has worked for or will work for DL.
the union mindset has been that they can push DL to give more and more on top of the fastest rates of compensation in the US airline industry - and well above most of the rest of US businesses as well.
Not only do DL employees who think they are going to push DL for more on their terms have virtually no negotiating power given the overall size of what DL is paying relative to competitors, but DL and no other company are candy store that employees can walk into to demand what they want on top of already very generous compensation.
Employees are a commodity just like fuel. Fuel doesn't talk back but it is a service.
Those DL employees who think they have the wisdom to redefine the way DL has succeeded for years might well find out that they are nothing more than a supplier or MRO that DL drops only to find another.
those are cold, hard words but they are ones that need to be spoken to those who arrogantly are convinced they know better than DL mgmt. and who think they can redefine a very successful strategy that has worked for decades.