What's new

Grassroots Efforts at DL for ACS and FAs, no personal attacks.

Status
Not open for further replies.
If  you want to board early, you have to assist, yes they are not forcing you to board early but if you do, then you have to help.
 
Its a big lawsuit waiting to happen, but DL's excuse will be is they volunteered.
 
These FAs need a union like yesterday!
 
Being willing to help and actually helping are two different things. Do you really think the crew is going to have the jumpseater doing a ton of work because they boarded early? I just don't see the big deal because it's likely to not happen, and if it does happen then you'll see a lot more people boarding in zone 1.
 
Agreed, and I suspect that discouraging early boarding was the company's intent all along.

Still, I can't help but wonder what will happen when that person who "just wants to help" gets hurt...
 
jumpseat benefits are non-rev related. Period.

DL has to account for every person that is on an aircraft. Crew members are known and accounted for. Jumpseat riders are not.

if FAs want to board early, they have to assist with the boarding process.

What is absolutely incredibly beyond belief is that an IAM salesman thinks he is capable of telling DL how to run its business or to say that a union could do any flipping thing in this process.

These are DL procedures that are driven by its legal requirements to account for whoever is on its aircraft and by its requirement to care for passengers. DL cannot and will not have crew members walking thru the cabin whenever they want and a union can't and won't do a thing about it.
 
Jump seats are only approved for use by certificated airmen or FAA, NTSB, etc.. They are not non-rev related. Delta may add additional duties for a jumpseat rider as policy. The jumpseater must be fit for duty to perform aircrew related duties.

There are FAR's for jumpseats.
 
Well, I can put all your fears to rest.  Delta will have to stop allowing commuting (not on duty, not deadheading) flight attendants from "helping with boarding"--particularly if the f/a is headed to work and not going home from work.
 
AA used to allow f/as not on the clock to "stand in stead" for boarding if they were  in uniform.  For instance, a working member of the crew is delayed in traffic or for some other reason, then a commuter in uniform could "stand in stead" to meet the minimum crew on board FAR, and the agents could start boarding.
 
The FAA said not only NO, but HELL NO when they found out what we were doing.  In fact, the company had to go back and show the commuting f/as as being on duty from the start of the boarding.  In some cases, it meant that the f/a was illegal to work the first day of their trip because they had been "on duty" so long.
 
If Delta is doing this, I imagine they will get a visit from the FAA before long.  Note, as far as I know this would not apply to a jumpseating gate agent or mechanic unless they are subject to some workday length restriction--either statutory or contractual.  Not a problem at AA because the f/a union controls who sits on the jumpseats, and only an AA or AE flight attendant can occupy a cabin jumpseat on an AA airplane.
 
By the way, who says you can't require people to work without pay.  F/As and Pilots do it every day.  And, it's perfectly legal.  We are required to sign-in for our first trip of the day no later than one hour prior to scheduled departure, but the pay clock does not start until the door closes and the brake is released.  And, at every stop during the day the clock stops when the door opens, and does not start again until the door closes and the brake is released for departure.  Furthermore, by FAR we must remain on the a/c until every passenger has exited the a/c--despite the fact that the pay clock stops the minute the a/c door opens. (This is becoming more and more of a problem since they outsourced the wheelchair activities to AirServ.  We waited with a wheelchair passenger for 20 minutes last week after every other passenger had deplaned for the wheelchair person to show up.
 
What I was told:
It stems from the fact the we are covered by the Railway Labor Act, not the Taft-Hartley Wage and Hour Act or any other of the more recent general labor laws.  The airlines do not pay us under the precedent set by the courts when the RLA was new.  For those who might remember Pullman cars and the porters (who were all African-American) that worked on them...the railroads went to the courts (this was in the 1920s, I think) and got the courts to rule that the Pullman porters did not have to be paid while the train was in the station because they weren't doing anything other than helping passengers on and off the train, and they got tipped for that.  (And, cleaning the lavs and the Pullman rooms, and sweeping the aisles, etc)  Under that same precedent, pilots and f/as are not paid "while the train is in the station."
 
As far as I know, no airline pilot or f/a union has ever disputed this practice.  I imagine the company (whether AA, DL, UA or any other airline) has always told them in negotiations that if they want to be paid from the time they sign-in until the end of the workday, they will have to take smaller raises.  Let's face it adding an hour or more to every pilot and f/as workday at flight pay rates would add an enormous amount of money to the cost of crews.
 
Agreed, Q. And again, I have to think on some level adding this in to existing policy was done with the intent of discouraging early boarding. I can't imagine anyone not wanting to just wait for Zone 1.

That said, if the unthinkable happens, and someone gets hurt, then what? I would think that HR wouldve nixed this, and instead suggested abolishing any early boarding as an alternative to the existing policy...
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Jump seats are only approved for use by certificated airmen or FAA, NTSB, etc.. They are not non-rev related. Delta may add additional duties for a jumpseat rider as policy. The jumpseater must be fit for duty to perform aircrew related duties.

There are FAR's for jumpseats.
Only for the cockpit jumpseats.  The FAA does not care who occupies a cabin jumpseat as long as that person (a la window exit seats) is briefed on the operation of any nearby cabin door.  WN allows any employee to occupy a cabin jumpseat, and the f/as brief them on the door operation.  At AA, our union (APFA) controls the cabin jumpseats, and only an AA or AE flight attendant can occupy one.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Jump seats are only approved for use by certificated airmen or FAA, NTSB, etc.. They are not non-rev related. Delta may add additional duties for a jumpseat rider as policy. The jumpseater must be fit for duty to perform aircrew related duties.

There are FAR's for jumpseats.
Jumpseats in the cockpit have different rules than in the cabin.

We aren't talking about cockpit jumpseats.

And DL most certainly does have control of its jumpseats both in the cabin and the cockpit because DL is required to know of every person that is on its aircraft and to ensure they have a right to be where they are. DL pilots cannot just walk into the cockpit and the same applies to the cabin jumpseats.

Also, DL does allow other airline pilots to use its jumpseats on a reciprocal basis but I don't believe that anyone other than DL FAs and possibly DL pilots (not even sure about that) can use DL cabin jumpseats.

and to me that is fair. DL FAs should not have to worry about someone else competing with them for the jumpseat and anyone who sits on a DL jumpseat should be prepared to work as part of the crew if it is necessary to do so. unlike in the cockpit, passengers look at the people on the jumpseat as crewmembers... they don't know who is part of the crew and who is not. And DL absolutely has liability requirements for evacuating its aircraft and caring for its passengers should FAs need to do so and having someone else who is not fully trained in DL's cabin safety procedures should not be in the way. DL provides more for its FAs by not allowing others onto those jumpseats than other airlines do - and it doesn't hurt at all if DL's reasons are for safety reasons... if validates the worth of DL FAs and says they have a unique role which cannot be duplicated or allowed to be confused with any other person.

again, the issue is that jumpseat FAs can board with the rest of the passengers if they don't want to work. If they are onboard and intending to sit in a jumpseat, they have to assist with boarding because you can't sit in a jumpseat during boarding. if an FA wants to sit in a jumpseat and want to board early (presumably to find a space for their bag), they have to help with boarding.

No one is telling them they have to work if they don't want to. they just have to board at the end of the boarding process and potentially check their bag.

And when they board, they have to be boarded as all other passengers are boarded thru DL's automated boarding processes.

A union cannot change those requirements.

arguing about cabin jumpseat procedures and requirements as part of an effort to push the union needs to be called for what it is and stripped out of this union discussion - which is allowed to wander all over creation in order to keep the topic open while other topics are cut off at their knees before they ever get to a single page.
 
There is no FAA restriction on anyone boarding early as long as minimum crew (working, not deadheading or commuting) is on board.  I.E.  One working f/a for every 50 seats (or part thereof) on the plane.  A plane with 200 passenger seats needs 4 working f/as for minimum crew.  A plane with 201 seats needs 5.
 
In fact, that has created a new problem.  In the past, a pilot jumpseating in the cockpit, or a f/a sharing the forward jumpseat with the #1 (assuming it's a plane with a double jumpseat upfront) would come on board, stow their bags, and then stand out on the jetbridge or in the terminal at the gate until the end of boarding so that they would be out of the way.  The TSA has ruled that they must now stay on board if their bags are on board.
 
and again, DL is simply saying that 1. jumpseating passengers in either cabin must be boarded using DL's automated procedures and 2. if FAs board early, they have to assist with the boarding process because you can't park your buns on a jumpseat during the boarding process.

DL's memo clearly addresses exactly the problem you just described. A JS FA can't board the aircraft and then get off and they can't not be present and be involved with the boarding process because they can't take a seat. DL won't allow JS passengers to stand in the aisle and gum up the boarding process.

This issue is nothing a union can do anything about and is simply one more attempt to try to paint the issue as a union issue when it is not something a union can do anything about because it involves federal regulations and DL's customer service standards which are pretty obviously connected to those very same federal regulations.
 
DL is simply saying that 1. jumpseating passengers in either cabin must be boarded using DL's automated procedures and 2. if FAs board early, they have to assist with the boarding process because you can't sit on a jumpseat during the boarding process.

it says nothing about staffing and nothing about the cockpit jumpseat

and why does an IAM advocate have access to a DL internal memo?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top