Grassroots Efforts at DL for ACS and FAs, no personal attacks.

[737823]

Either you're remembering it wrong, or she got it half right.Did she tell you where NYC-based people could see the election results?

Didn't ask. Why should the results be public?

Josh

 

[Kev3188]

Didn't ask. Why should the results be public?

Josh

Transparency... Accountability... All the usuals...

You're not seriously gonna argue against that, are you?

 

[737823]

Transparency... Accountability... All the usuals...

The IAM doesn't detail officer "elections" and ratification "votes" by station now do they? So you are holding DL to a higher standard?

Josh

 

[WorldTraveler]

as long as you argue with the reality that DL employees have CONSISTENTLY voted against further unionization.

 

[Kev3188]

The IAM doesn't detail officer "elections" and ratification "votes" by station now do they?

143 sure did. Can't speak for any other DL...

 

[737823]

They sure did when I was a member...

The recent grand lodge officer "election" was pretty fishy to say the least.

Josh

 

[Kev3188]

as long as you argue with the reality that DL employees have CONSISTENTLY voted against further unionization.

My turn. See below...

perhaps you can start by rewriting the sentence above in English which a literate English speaker could understand.

I know you are trying hard to nail Josh to the wall but plz don't let go of what you usually do quite well - communicate effectively.

 

 

[WorldTraveler]

DL people have consistently voted against unionization.

why do you fight so hard to accept the will of your coworkers?

and what DL employee involvement groups have you volunteered to join?

 

[700UW]

The IAM doesn't detail officer "elections" and ratification "votes" by station now do they? So you are holding DL to a higher standard?

Josh

Actually yes they do.
 
Keep up the lies and misinformation.

 

[700UW]

The recent grand lodge officer "election" was pretty fishy to say the least.

Josh

Care to prove that?
 
Since it was a rerun ordered by the DOL who had to approve everything each step of the way.

 

[robbedagain]

well there are undoubtedly malcontents who don't make it but I suppose you are going to tell us that they are CONTENT with the way things are?there are far more MALCONTENTS on this site at airlines who have unions than have EVER showed up at DL union events.

u are counting urself in that Malcontents correct?

 

[737823]

Care to prove that?
 
Since it was a rerun ordered by the DOL who had to approve everything each step of the way.

You proved it. Due to Tim's efforts the DOL ordered a new election.

Josh

 

[WorldTraveler]

u are counting urself in that Malcontents correct?

ha!

you could wish I was malcontent.

anything but.

 

[Kev3188]

DL people have consistently voted against unionization.

"Have."

You've noted that one of DL's greatest collective assets is not looking in the rearview mirror. Have you changed your mind?

 

[700UW]

You proved it. Due to Tim's efforts the DOL ordered a new election.

Josh

Wrong once again, the IAM entered into a voluntary compliance agreement, you do know what voluntary means?