topDawg
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 2,957
- Reaction score
- 2,298
No one has said it. WT is tossing more butt hurt crap against the wall again.Kev3188 said:Anyone?
You can't push fear and tell the truth all the time. For him to push fear he has to almost, if not, lie to get people to fall into line and think as he tells them too. You can have an opinion as long as it is what is best for Delta. If Delta wants to grind you kids up and use them as jet fuel he would spin it into a positive.
Jesus man. You just make as much crap up as you possibly can and hope some of it sticks.WorldTraveler said:horse pucky.
Kev and other ACTIVE DL employees have whined about the RR program for years.
You can't argue that ALL AA employees are better compensated even with profit sharing compared to all DL employees.
the better benefits that AA is for a limited part of the population - esp. at AA where the workforce is more senior. DL has grown the airline and has more younger seniority employees who benefit MORE by profit sharing than by giving higher cost benefits to the highest seniority employees.
DL's compensation model does a better job of spreading the wealth with as much of the population than any union based compensation model where pay and benefits are tailored to those in power which are largely higher seniority people.
NO one HAS to do any job including working RR for DL. DL attracts a lot of intelligent people who want flexible work schedules that is heavily centered on the most peak travel periods of the year.
you don't have to want the job. It's not for you.
RR is a different term for a system that DL has used since well before deregulation. And there are many, many DL people who started as part-time, non-benefitted employees and have moved up - or who earned the money they needed and moved on to other jobs.
One of my very good friends worked for DL exactly under this type of program while in college, quit when he got a career that was related to his degree and nothing about what DL does, and is now a Diamond Medallion on DL - and remains a very big fan of the way DL does business.
the system works to the benefit of many people and the company.
you and others simply do not want to admit it because it doesn't allow the union to create long-term union members.
The only thing Kev has said about RR is wanting to see clear language (that the company cant change at will) on how many there are per station. How this is rocket science to understand I have no idea.
Who has said they want to see RR go away?WorldTraveler said:the IAM will, wait, wait, negotiate what the members want.
Why do they have to "give them" something? I know quite a few RRs in ATL and all of them want to see clear limits (even if it is the current numbers) and clear language on the program. That allows those that want to advance to have an idea of how/when/where they will be able to do it, and those that want to stay as RR(quite a few of them) can do so also.WorldTraveler said:what ARE you proposing that the IAM can give the RRs that won't make the program too costly that DL eliminates the program and starts closing stations?