Grassroots Efforts at DL for ACS and FAs, no personal attacks.

[WorldTraveler]

Since you seem so excited for that to happen, how about agreeing with me that the DOJ needs to start their investigation post haste?

you mean it hasn't been started? How do you know?

 

[Kev3188]

I haven't seen/heard/read anything indicating it's begun. If you-or anyone else- knows otherwise, I'd love to see it.

 

[townpete]

I haven't seen/heard/read anything indicating it's begun. If you-or anyone else- knows otherwise, I'd love to see it.

 
Two months later and you lovely petition only hasn't even reached its paltry goal?
 
hehe

 

[WorldTraveler]

The representation process has been established and it needs to be followed. Whoever has been involved in bastardizing it needs to be held accountable.

The merits of representation need to be measured fairly - not by whoever can game the system the best.

 

[southwind]

Since you seem so excited for that to happen, how about agreeing with me that the DOJ needs to start their investigation post haste?

No Kev, I am not excited about the entire situation and the only reason I posted what I did was pro-union peeps are soooooo sure this was the company's doing, thinking Unions can do no wrong and are their Savior.
And yes I believe the DOJ should be making this a priority and penalize the culprits appropriately!

 

[700UW]

The IAM would not have benefited from fraudulent cards, as after the cards are filed, if there are enough, there would still be a vote held.
 
Only side it would help is the pro-DL anti-Union side.

 

[metopower]

The IAM would not have benefited from fraudulent cards, as after the cards are filed, if there are enough, there would still be a vote held.
 
Only side it would help is the pro-DL anti-Union side.

B.S. And you know it . I need more arrows......

 

[700UW]

B.S. And you know it . I need more arrows......

Its not BS.

Filing cards doesnt mean you get a union, the card process is filing for an election to be come unionized.
 
The IAM has no benefit from filing fraudulent cards, as there are still 20,000 eligible votes.

So prove your statement.

 

[Kev3188]

And yes I believe the DOJ should be making this a priority and penalize the culprits appropriately!

I'm glad we can at least agree on that...

 

[Kev3188]

The representation process has been established and it needs to be followed. Whoever has been involved in bastardizing it needs to be held accountable.

The merits of representation need to be measured fairly - not by whoever can game the system the best.

The process-and it's oversight- is archaic and needs to be completely overhauled. Agree on the rest of the post...

 

[700UW]

 

[southwind]

The IAM would not have benefited from fraudulent cards, as after the cards are filed, if there are enough, there would still be a vote held.
 
Only side it would help is the pro-DL anti-Union side.

See what I mean.Kev!

 

[700UW]

See what I mean.Kev!

You truly dont understand the process.
 
If the IAM filed with fraudulent cards how would they win an election without the support of the DL FAs?
 
Filing cards only calls for an election, it doesnt certify the union.
 
So explain how filing fraudulent cards would benefit the IAM?

 

[southwind]

You truly dont understand the process.
 
If the IAM filed with fraudulent cards how would they win an election without the support of the DL FAs?
 
Filing cards only calls for an election, it doesnt certify the union.
 
So explain how filing fraudulent cards would benefit the IAM?

Let's get real, Union Pimp! I CAN see the IAM submitting fraudulent cards in order to have a vote, because once they've secured that vote and with the rule change, concerning voting the odds would be in their favor that the no votes would not bother to vote at all and just stag at home
Now tell me that's not a likely scenario!

 

[700UW]

Let's get real, Union Pimp! I CAN see the IAM submitting fraudulent cards in order to have a vote, because once they've secured that vote and with the rule change, concerning voting the odds would be in their favor that the no votes would not bother to vote at all and just stag at home
Now tell me that's not a likely scenario!

You truly dont get it still.
 
If they call for a vote, 50%+1 of all votes cast have to vote yes, if they filed with fraudulent cards, they wont have a majority of people voting yes, now will they?
 
You cant be reasoned with, your blind to the facts and reality of the situation
 
And its clear you dont even know how the process work, they dont go to a polling place, you either vote by internet or phone.

So try again.
 
And glad to see you cant even hold a debate without calling someone a name.
 
And I dont work for any union nor get paid by one.

So keep trying.