texasreb
Senior
- Jul 26, 2008
- 378
- 171
If that is direction AMR wants to go then the term "Business As Usual" used by Horton on Day 1 of his tenure, will mean more than I thought.
Tulsa Management is telling us that accountability and produtivity changes are coming.
Your Management telling you a paycut will save Overhaul Jobs.
How the hell can we have both and have new aircraft/engines on the way? Impossible
You know as well I do that there are currently still too many heads in overhaul.
Add in the desired production gains and accountability and you will have headcuts required regardless of paycuts.
Yes, we tried that plan in 2003, not going to happen or work a second time.
The Union needs to tell management and the membership that it is NOT the Union's job to manage AMR and explain to everyone that the Union is no longer going to take the blame for what is required to pay for management mistakes. In other words Unions need to stop taking the bait and the blame for this merry-go-round of ignorance. But Dues collection and protection of the relatives jobs will once again get in the way of valid representation.
Tell Management they will take the blame and they will come up with the plan to correct their errors.
TWU position should be rejected T/A is minimum plan.
I don't think overhaul will ever see the new planes or engines. As the airbuses and 787's come time for overhaul they will be outsourced. As the md 80's are retired, Tulsa will be smaller if it survives at all in the future.