O-man,
I believe you commited a typo... "
SO AVOIDS THE O-MAN :huh:
" would have been more appropriate. As you have parried the issue, I'll ask directly... which one of Boss Canale's toadies gave bad information to LAS?
However, maybe I am mistaken as it was not a typo, but a misused word... "
SO OBFUSCATES THE O-MAN :huh:
" would have been correct as not once during the entire debate on the contract vote did you or anyone else ever mention Article 9, Paragraph 2 of the CBA. To go one better, never did you or anyone else ever mention the carte blache attendance policy given to Management either. However, NOW you are going to take credit in the foresight of "scope and language" even though you and others were COMPLETELY quiet on these matters, and bash "Yes" voters for taking the huge wage gains?! To suggest you are attempting to deliberately muddle the issues while tossing in non-sequiturs would be generously kind.
Okay, one last try... "
SO ABDICATES THE O-MAN :huh:
" ... Oh, I could only wish. If you think this current bunch of clowns are representing me and I just don't know it, then I wish they should just sit in their offices or go have back-slapping conventions consisting mostly of chowing on brats while chugging beer. I figure it this way because no representation is better than bad representation, as I could rely upon myself instead of deluding myself into thinking I am obtaining expert or professional advice from novices.
So Corrects Jester.