ROA, GF, and Oman,
I can assure you that chockjockey and jester are not the same person.
Sweet vindication!
And can we stop with the East/West argument please, we are all USAirways Fleet Service. Lets not start acting like some other employee group that we all know. It is no longer East and West.
I agree completely. The East/West dichotomy is fading, and has been ever since we've been under the same contract. The argument in regards to the educational or legal competence/experience/education of the union leadership/negotiators while valid is a secondary and distracting concern; the greater threat to Fleet Service is division of its self along geographical or political lines. I strongly support solidarity based on universal group identity and group interest, true solidarity, not to an ideology or clique or voting bloc. Only then can the full potential of collective bargaining be realized.
The East and West have been integrated; through station closings and transfers many have crossed where there once were barriers. I have been fortunate enough to talk with a lot of the folks that came to PHX from all over the system and have gained some very intriguing insights and explanations in terms of conditions and operations at other hubs and other stations. For example, I used to hate on PHL like a lot of other people but it wasn't until I spoke with some of the leads from there that I got an understanding of how things were/are like there and the challenges and impediments that PHL fleet had to deal with.
Rather than establish our own ignorant assumptions and use them as foundations for understanding we should be asking questions and learn about the different environments and conditions under which Fleet operates around the system. True solidarity is the only solution.
P.S.
With the exception of PHX, they appear to want to be seperated from the rest of us. (I know not all in PHX feel this way though). No offense to the rest of PHX that do not feel that way.
Not all in PHX feel this way because most in PHX have no opinion on the matter at all, this being because most of them are in the dark about the goings on of the district and union business as a whole. Why is this? Some have suggested that it's a demographic phenomenon, that people in PHX aren't interested in union activity because of their political beliefs or lifestyle or life goals. Others will argue that this is the result of poor leadership on behalf of the PHX GC. I think that both of these are contributing factors to PHX renowned apathy.
I don't have a whole lot to go on because PHX is the only station I've ever worked and this is the only union job I've ever had. I like our GC. They are cool people. They're available and attentive to concerns that are brought to them and I do feel that they have the best interests of the membership at heart.
However, they seem to just... blend in with everybody else. There's not so much of a union
presence with them, if that makes sense. Having taken time to reflect on it, I think that PHX could be better served by a group of persons that are observably more engaging, energetic, enthusiastic, and outreaching to the membership. There should be more talking and walking around the ramp and break rooms, getting to know the agents, their worries, concerns, opinions. Why should people be interested in the union if it's apparent that the union isn't interested in them? CL posted here a while back explaining the challenges and unique facets of the PHX membership and I don't disagree with what he wrote, however, those specified challenges are not overcome by chilling out in the A-side break room reading the paper or shooting the breeze with the rest of the AWA old guard.
PHX deserves true leadership in this regard; passive but functional might help to satisfy station concerns but it bothers me that PHX is on the path to exile, self-imposed or otherwise from the body of Fleet, with possibly serious consequences, while PHX membership remains by a majority aloof and apathetic.
These are just my impressions and observations and opinion.