Iam Mechanic And Related Agreement On Line

[makers mark]

[font="Lucida Console"]http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/usair_iam_agreement_intro.htm

Finally, the IAM agreement at US AIRWAYS - additions and deletions!

Join the Teamsters.

On this site you will also see all the tentative agreements on line for AWA.

No surprises and no B.S.

B) [font=Lucida Console][/font]

 

[Awa Contract]

Sign a Card and Secure the Vote - Do your own research and make up your own mind - Then Vote what is best for you and your future - remember - IT IS YOUR CAREER AND YOUR LIVELYHOOD

 

[700UW]

Even if the IBT gets voted in the IAM contract remains in effect until 2009.

When AMFA took over at UAL and WN no new contracts were negotiated until the amendable dates, same for NWA and AMFA and NWA and the PFAA.

Don't let the facts get in your way.

 

[Awa Contract]

AMFA is a raider as you well know when they move in they wait till the new contract is done so they donot have to endure the expense. If you are as sharp as you claim you know that.

Try something different sometime like saying all the facts not just the bits and pieces.

 

[700UW]

I said all the facts, when a union raids as you are doing as teamsters, you dont get to negotiate a new contract until the amendable date comes.

Thats the facts Jack!

 

[Bird Doctor]

I said all the facts, when a union raids as you are doing as teamsters, you dont get to negotiate a new contract until the amendable date comes.

Thats the facts Jack!

That is what we are doing now. Working on the new contract. Not one in 2009.

 

[Awa Contract]

700 - get a little nasty when caught , eh??

 

[justaumechanic]

Who said the IAM agreement will be the surviving document? When AMFA took over at UAL and LUV
there was only one contract standing. Not two. They just took over as the bargaining agent.

You keep saying the IAM contract will be the surviving document. You don't know that for sure. No
one does. Keep in mind for the purpose of legality AmericaWest is the surviving company with a
name change. The old US Airways is gone.

And if you don't believe that you can read it in the BK filings and in the SEC filings.

So saying the IAM contract will be the suriving document is unfounded at this time.

Even if the IBT gets voted in the IAM contract remains in effect until 2009.

When AMFA took over at UAL and WN no new contracts were negotiated until the amendable dates, same for NWA and AMFA and NWA and the PFAA.

Don't let the facts get in your way.

 

[700UW]

The IAM contract will be the surviving contract, otherwise the IBT would be not be seeking cards to represent the M&R group. Is the IBT CBA would be the surviving CBA they would be filing single carrier status with the NMB as the IAM has done.

And AWAcontract, I have not been caught nor nasty, just providing the correct information instead of the misinformation the IBT posters have been providing.

Here is a little merger history:

PSA merger, IAM certifed as bargaining unit and IAM CBA, not IBT.

Piedmont merger, both IAM and US CBA surviving.

The NMB does not care about SEC filings, it is merger with US Airways as the surviving carrier.

 

[jack mama]

Why is there an argument? 700, you haven't provide any facts that say the IAM contract will stay....

Is there a hearing or a vote or arbitration to decide which contract prevails at the combined company? What are the dates that lie ahead?

 

[700UW]

There is no arguement, I am simply providing information.

The NMB makes the determination and since US outnumbers the HP by far the past precedent is everyone will be IAM, not IBT. HP has to be 35% of the US mechanics in order for the NMB to call for an election without the signing of A-Cards.

Why do you think the IBT is seeking cards?

They know the NMB will certify the IAM as the representative for the M&R group.

There is no vote when the group less the 35% and there is no arbitration in representation votes.

 

[jack mama]

Ok, so what are the exact numbers the NMB is looking at?

Do those numbers change if the IBT gets more cards signed?

 

[gonzo]

I said all the facts, when a union raids as you are doing as teamsters, you dont get to negotiate a new contract until the amendable date comes.

Thats the facts Jack!

Good morning Mr. 700,

I see you are up to your old tricks again. Ok......but the IAM is raiding Tempe on Thursday. Did you pay attention like you were supposed too?
🙂

 

[justaumechanic]

700 - I went thru both the PSA merger and the Piedmont merger.. There is one clear distinct difference.

USAir aquired PSA and Piedmont. This time around US Airways aquired no one. US Airways got
bought out. If you don't believe that you can read it for your self in the SEC filings and the BK
filings..

Dont let the facts get in your way as you always say.

There is no guarantee that the IAM contract as written will be the surviving document. Either union
can represent using either document.. There is a difference you just fail to see it.

And I am not accusing you of anything.. You simply only state the facts as viewed from you IAM point of
view. The truth of the matter is the company has no intention of honoring the IAM contract. For the simple
reason it has the Scope language the company does not want. Thats a simple fact.

DP and his team of high priced lawyers are right now working on their plans to make sure that
the scope language as written does not exist when the merger is complete.

And speaking of merger.. This is not a merger.. If you have not been able to see it yet it is
a take over. When 99% of US Airways leadership is launched and taken over by AWA leadership
thats a takeover not a merger. It is a takeover with a name change. Nothing more and nothing less..

I look forward to the day you eat crow when the IAM contract goes "poof" right before you eyes.

And one additional thing. Yes the IBT contract does not have the scope that the IAM contract does..
However the AWA mechanics make more money and have better benefits. All you have to do is read their
contract which the IBT has made available. The IAM on the other hand has kept their contract
concealed and un available until the IBT posted it on their website..

The IAM contract will be the surviving contract, otherwise the IBT would be not be seeking cards to represent the M&R group. Is the IBT CBA would be the surviving CBA they would be filing single carrier status with the NMB as the IAM has done.

And AWAcontract, I have not been caught nor nasty, just providing the correct information instead of the misinformation the IBT posters have been providing.

Here is a little merger history:

PSA merger, IAM certifed as bargaining unit and IAM CBA, not IBT.

Piedmont merger, both IAM and US CBA surviving.

The NMB does not care about SEC filings, it is merger with US Airways as the surviving carrier.

 

[700UW]

In a merger in order for a vote to take place to choose which union will it be the smaller group has to be at least 35% of the total group including furloughees.

In order for a vote to happen if the NMB declares one union the bargaining agent since they are not the required 35% they union wanting the vote has to get 35% of the total employee group, including furloughees to sign an A-Card, then if an election is held a union on the ballot has to get 50%+1 off all the group in order to be certfied, if they fail to gather the 50%+1 the group will then be non-union with no collective bargaining agreement and will become employees at will.