----------------
On 3/22/2003 7
51 AM copilot wrote:
dfw79,
I don''t know what you do but it is now obvious that you don''t know what you are talking about. Airplanes at Airlines do not have to be painted at every heavy MX check. So go paint yourself if you think you understand everything associated with the cost of changing a fleets color scheme.
The other point stands, do you want to comment on the ethics of stepping on the backs of workers while management gets rich.
As for the scheme itself, "I think it looks great", good choice.
----------------
I never said every check...so don''t put words in my mouth. However, during certain checks that each plane goes through...they must be stripped of all paint and repainted. That is when the repainting will take place.
I''m not going to comment on management getting rich and employees getting laid off...it has nothing to do with airplane painting - since that is something that has to happen anyway.
----------------
On 3/22/2003 7
51 AM copilot wrote:
Oh boy, I have seen this before, at USAirways. Burn all the cash changing the paint, logo, uniforms etc. Guess what comes next? Layoffs, lease returns, pay cuts. Hope it goes better for NW than United and Airways. Good luck to all!! New aircraft come any color you want, no charge.
WO/drone
----------------
Please read before you post. Only the paint scheme is changing...NOTHING ELSE. All uniforms, airport signage, etc. will remain the same.
Everyone is also missing the part that Northwest Airlines is on the aircraft just under the NWA. All we are seeing is the gradual introduction of the "NWA" brand....with the website being nwa.com and other things coming down the pike (i''m sure)...it will be important to educate consumers NWA means Northwest Airlines - since it has been a few decades since they''ve used it maintstream.