Your're still trying to play off your brilliance but you should just stick to your first stroke of genius.
Why did TWA sue ALPA and not APA? Hint: TWA pilots are APA pilots now (after ALPA made the agreement with APA), just like YOU will be an APA pilot (after USAPA makes a deal with APA). If you think you are going to sue APA for a DFR that USAPA is responsible for, then why didn't ALPA get off the hook by saying APA inherited everything? Because they didn't! And since APA didn't inherit any guilt from ALPA's former resposabilities, they won't inherit any guilt from USAPA's.
Don't be so shy. Take a bow, we are applauding you.
Indeed! Take a bow. USAPA will be long gone after any integration with APA. There won't be anything left to sue! Unlike ALPA. USAPA is just doing its' job to represent the majority of pilots in the transaction. Just because they aren't around in a few years later after it is all said and done, is nobodys fault. It is just a normal course of events, a perfect example of what Freund warned of. "All the risk lies with the west......" Can't say the West was not warned, and they were. It is just the normal course of events in a merger. If the West wants to go ahead fully warned about the danger of no compromise, that is their lot in life.How do you sue, when you knew the Nic was not required by USAPA to use? Even the 9th said it over and over. If you don't listen, that is your fault. I wish there was some compromise, and the Nic obviously isn't working.