What's new

M&R Vote

And for those that are pushing amfa or ibt, the members are ignorant and will put in the same nitwits that are there today.
It is a losing proposition The unions have forgotten to change with the times.
If you are suing the union local leaership, then why would the membership worry?
 
And for those that are pushing amfa or ibt, the members are ignorant and will put in the same nitwits that are there today.
It is a losing proposition The unions have forgotten to change with the times.
At least nitwits in AMFA could be removed from office when it becomes obvious to the membership
 
I am beginning to believe that whatajoke dislikes Bob Owens....
 
Bob you are a liar,
I am in the process of suing your local and 514,and any other that told everyone to vote no on the 2010 offer. You gave everyone very bad information and there is plenty of it on you tube and this website. So if your local is not bankrupt yet get ready, you cost members a lot of money. I call it responsibility for your actions.

I would love to meet the lawyer you are using to pursue this.
But without knowing any legality in a lawsuit for representation, I would say that bad information is not grounds for a lawsuit.
But then again, who knows.
Anyway, good luck with your endeavors.
 
Realityck, on 10 September 2012 - 08:30 PM, said:

I'll admit I thought you and Peterson were joined at the hip due to your mutual Vote NO Entertainment Video. Was he a yes voter until he joined your team? I really don't know.

So when you accused Peterson were you lying or just wrong?

I believed Peterson was your sidekick but if you say he wasn’t, of course I’ll believe you.



YOU WERE LYING TO THE MEMBERS BOB!

Where is what I wrote? You claiming that I claimed something doesnt make it so. You included your spin of what I wrote. Why not include what I actually wrote? I quoted you when I accused you of saying something then you quote yourself when you accuse me of saying something, funny, why is that? I think the answer is obvious


Bob Owens
Posted 20 July 2012 - 05:03 AM
Veteran​

Registered Member​

10,949 posts​

High Speed Steel, on 19 July 2012 - 09:40 PM, said:


Wrong. I'm 50 and exceed the years of service requirement and my prefunding including interest is just over $6,300.00 so add that to the Early Out offer and the estimated walk away would exceed $45,500.00 before receiving the companies prefunding portion if it comes to fruitation...

If, if, if.
By voting yes you are offering the company half the fund to use in a settlement with the 1114 committee and make themslves look good at our expense.

Now I know you weren’t implying a yes vote would deny the company prefunding to active participants were you? Get serious.
 
No just pissed off at these idiots calling themselves leaders.
With this type of leaders we are better off with no union anyway.

Whatajoke. It appears you are anti-union and no matter the outcome you would still be throwing stones.Why don't you start being a leader and advocate for no union representation on AA property if that is what you truely believe in. In the mean time I will still support AMFA and continue to get cards signed. Now is the time to replace the TWU. PROUD TO BE UNION.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top