Fly
Veteran
Yes.Do you really think the F/A job would be what it is today (which is apparently a job you covet since you are still around) if it weren't for the work of AFA all these decades?
Yes.Do you really think the F/A job would be what it is today (which is apparently a job you covet since you are still around) if it weren't for the work of AFA all these decades?
Ah, come on Fly...I know that you're more intelligent than that...
One question: WHAT were you thinking???? Instead of a union that just represented one airline, you now have a union that represents NO ONE!!! (except Pat and friends)
Sky high states: You're IGNORANT. Fly. Exactly WHAT did the Independent UNION do for it's members, better yet, for ALL the Flight Attendants in this industry? On a national level? HUH? AFA has years, upon years on MILESTONES:http://www.afanet.org/default.asp?nc=6336&id=37
You're personal vendetta has no purpose on here!
[/quote
Sky High, short and to the point. I agree.
That may be. Perhaps I am ignorant because AFA sure helped the f/a on my flight who stole about 20 minis, drank about 12 of them, popped a slide and ran around the tarmac, got drug tested and showed up positive,......and then got his job back (with back pay) about 8 months later. Way To Go AFA!!!
Sorry we don't agree.
You say this (merit) like it's a bad thing. Shouldn't pay be based on the actual value that is provided by your service (or in other words, merit). A second year FA that works his/her ass off and provides great service should be paid more than a 55 year old grump that only does what is absolutely necessary to get the job done. The former is a more valuable employee, and thus should be paid more. That's basic economics.Have your RAISE based on "merit" instead of an actual PAY SCALE.
You say this (merit) like it's a bad thing. Shouldn't pay be based on the actual value that is provided by your service (or in other words, merit). A second year FA that works his/her ass off and provides great service should be paid more than a 55 year old grump that only does what is absolutely necessary to get the job done. The former is a more valuable employee, and thus should be paid more. That's basic economics.
A second year FA that works his/her ass off and provides great service should be paid more than a 55 year old grump that only does what is absolutely necessary to get the job done. The former is a more valuable employee, and thus should be paid more. That's basic economics.
You say this (merit) like it's a bad thing. Shouldn't pay be based on the actual value that is provided by your service (or in other words, merit). A second year FA that works his/her ass off and provides great service should be paid more than a 55 year old grump that only does what is absolutely necessary to get the job done. The former is a more valuable employee, and thus should be paid more. That's basic economics.