What's new

OCT/NOV 2012 US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
And I assume, by that reference, you are excluding all Jews from salvation as well?

By no means. You assume a great deal indeed. I've a passing knowledge of most of the major religions and make no claim towards the unquestionable supremacy of any man-made, and often-modified notions of the spirit over another. We all choose what beliefs we find best. The inconceivable power beyond ourselves determines the ultimate viability of all such. I have my beliefs, but do not even begin to presume on God's Will towards myself or any others. I'll just leave it with the reasonable assumption that you're not the First Cause, nor the life force of the universe. You seem to struggle with that idea, and do so, I'd suggest, to your personal loss.
 
But instead of a bullet going through your head, it'll be the Nic going through your career.

Whle that's a kindly thought indeed...well... I've not seen so much as even an angry missle in over twenty years now, and your little nic doesn't serve to threaten. I wish you and your literally insane ego a fine day. 🙂
 
Learn to comprehend.



Lakefield was a care-taker CEO after US fired Siegel, Lakefield was a retired Shearson Lehman Executive who had no desire to be a long-term CEO.

So you're claiming Lakefield chose to merge with AWA?
 
Verge? No, I'm fine.

You, though, have been stunted mentally for quite a while. That inbreeding out east is terrible I'm sure. You still have that rocking chair and violin?
Such anger form you furloughed children that will not be returning. Have you thought of a new profession yet?
 
Such anger form you furloughed children that will not be returning. Have you thought of a new profession yet?

Indeed. One suggestion for starters: http://www.ehow.com/how_6224063_become-professional-video-game-player.html
 
I'm no lawyer Claxon, but that actually looks like the company just wants to make sure the Judge's ruling applies to ALL WEST PILOTS. That actually doesn't look good to me for them, but again I guessing.

"the judgment does not describe the class bound by
the judgment, as required by Rule 23©(3)."

"The Court’s intent here was clear – to have its judgment bind the West Pilots class.
(See, e.g., Doc. No. 193 at 1 n.1 (“The West Pilot Defendants are Don Addington, John
Bostic, Mark Burman, Afshin Iranpour, Roger Velez, and Steve Wargocki, on behalf of
themselves and the certified West Pilot Class.&rdquo😉.) Accordingly, it is appropriate for the
judgment to be corrected pursuant to Rule 60(a) to conform to the technical requirements
for class-action judgments."

Agreed. The whole reason the COMPANY sought to make the West pilots a class (rather than just the six named defendants) was so that a judgement would apply to all the West pilots.

From Silver's Order that made the West Pilot Class….



Due to the threatened litigation, US Airways believes it needs guidance from this
Court and, if appropriate, protection from suit from all the West Pilots. Declaratory relief
against only the six named West Pilots would be worthless as it would leave over 1,800 other
West Pilots free to file suit against US Airways.1 Accordingly, US Airways has moved to
certify a defendant class consisting of “All pilots employed by the airline US Airways in
September 2008 who were on the America West seniority list on September 20, 2005.”


She went on to justify a West class by saying in the absence of a West CLASS, the pilots other than the six could be free rather than bound by her final order.
A judgment barring the six pilots from suing US Airways would not bar the other
pilots from doing so.

Pi has it correct. The company wants to make sure that the judgement is free from any confusion...



"the judgment does not describe the class bound by the judgment"


"The Court’s intent here was clear – to have its judgment bind the West Pilots class."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top