What's new

OCT/NOV 2012 US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Call it seniority or longevity, who cares how you split hairs.....the bottom line is the importance of time spent on the job and has nothing to do with some dreamed up idea of leapfrog.

I was a Captain before 9/11. Unfortunately, with Washington Reagan being closed down after 9/11 for an extended period of time, USAir management decided to declare force majuire (sp?) and parked 101 of our fleet of 429 jets, furloughing 1958 pilots. You guys probly never dreamed of having 429 jets, eh?

Now, for you to claim that you deserve a higher position than pilots who have invested more time on the job is BS. You are no better than the terriorists who have tried to take advantage of the events of 9/11.

We will not give in to that concept.

Your hometown boy, Wake did not allow full argument about the seniority dispute, yet you claim a victory, which is BS.

330's in PHX, you're kidding, right?

breeze

Call it seniority or longevity, who cares how you split hairs...

Wow dude if you call the difference between seniority and longevity splitting hairs you have no business even being on this forum. You are so far gone from reality. You can place all the importance you want on how long you managed to keep your job somewhere but that is not the only factor. Many other factors go into merging a SENIORITY list. Those factors did not favor the east.

Once again you don't like the FACTS that US Airways was done. They had a poor business model and was going out of business. So you call a well respected war hero a terrorist, George Nicolau created that list not west pilots. You east guys will attack and call names to anyone who disagrees with you. Painting a federal judge as a"home town boy" because he followed the rules and disagreed with you. As I said before if you think he did not follow the rules file charges otherwise it is just another false accusation. Seham got his butt handed to him when he accuses judge Wake of misdeeds.

Very childish calling people of authority names because they don't agree with you.

Hopw many federal judges from around the country not "home toen boys" have agreed with you?

RICO N.C. failed
4th circuit RICO VA. failed

Status quo N.Y. failed

Injunction N.C. failed

Even in your "home town" you can't win.
 
You demonstrate another central part of the problem yet again. Eastholes do not differentiate between seniority and longevity. Two very different things, yet they consider that splitting hairs.

Face it, breeze, you clung to a loser airline circling the drain for 18 years. You were mistreated with force majure furloughs, contract concessions and whatever else you whine about.

A better man would have moved on, found a better job. You clung to your situation and seven years ago a company that you considered inferior came in and saved your miserable career.

Now you want to make up for your misery by snaking around a legal and binding process (which you agreed to) in order to take from those who were working for that (inferior) company that saved your ass.

You easthole scumbags just make me sick.

Harsh, yet accurate.
 
What about pilots cleaning planes during the 30 day cooling off period and the strike by the IAM M&R during October of 92?

What about the sweetheart deal ALPA made to cross the picket lines?

All the MD80s, DC-9s, 737-200s, F28s and F100s were grounded yet all the pilots got paid, which the company per the CBA didnt have to do.

Glass house.
 
Okay, so we can perhaps agree that both east and west live in glass houses - or more accurately, the same glass house. Now that we've demolished the partition walls, perhaps we should refrain from throwing stones at the load bearing ones.

Stop telling us what the courts have warned us about and begin to focus on what their actual ruling has been, both at the 9th and Silver. The Wake ruling was vacated. Yes the facts may remain for posterity but the next DFR will be before a different jury and perhaps a different judge. If we ever get to that point you will need to prove your case all over again, with the backdrop of several years of hindsight not entirely supportive of many of your claims and which will not be lost on anyone.

You and your lawyers accuse us of a re-do, but you are stuck back in 2007 and refuse to accept reality and move off that point in time. You really like snapshots, whether financial or legal.

Wake would not allow a full and open debate on the fairness of the Nic. You say that Nic didn't need to be fair. I say malarkey. Even ALPA policy assumed a fair and equitable process. Longevity IS seniority at every other union and every time in union history with the exception of ALPA pilot groups these past couple decades.
 
Wake would not allow a full and open debate on the fairness because that's not what was on trial in court. How to get that to sink into your east-idiot brains I'll never know.

Fairness was a part of the SLI and a NEUTRAL arbitrator came up with the solution. What you may think unfair, everyone else has found fair so get over yourself.

I can guarantee that when this comes up again that your fairness will not be discussed again. Wake did the correct thing not putting the Nic on trial because that was irrelevant.

You guys need to move on and get over it. Arbitrations like this aren't overturned - ever and you guys aren't special enough to be the first.

We merged as did our seniority. Longevity and seniority, in this case, is not the same. Get over that as well.

And while you're getting over it, LOA93 is making sure you're connected with your past.
 
Wake would not allow a full and open debate on the fairness because that's not what was on trial in court. How to get that to sink into your east-idiot brains I'll never know.

Fairness was a part of the SLI and a NEUTRAL arbitrator came up with the solution. What you may think unfair, everyone else has found fair so get over yourself.

I can guarantee that when this comes up again that your fairness will not be discussed again. Wake did the correct thing not putting the Nic on trial because that was irrelevant.

You guys need to move on and get over it. Arbitrations like this aren't overturned - ever and you guys aren't special enough to be the first.

We merged as did our seniority. Longevity and seniority, in this case, is not the same. Get over that as well.

And while you're getting over it, LOA93 is making sure you're connected with your past.

I got over myself (and it) when I stopped wearing T-shirts with slogans and telling others to get over it (and themselves) - back somewhere in the late 70's.
 
Call it seniority or longevity, who cares how you split hairs...

Wow dude if you call the difference between seniority and longevity splitting hairs you have no business even being on this forum. You are so far gone from reality. You can place all the importance you want on how long you managed to keep your job somewhere but that is not the only factor. Many other factors go into merging a SENIORITY list. Those factors did not favor the east.

Once again you don't like the FACTS that US Airways was done. They had a poor business model and was going out of business. So you call a well respected war hero a terrorist, George Nicolau created that list not west pilots. You east guys will attack and call names to anyone who disagrees with you. Painting a federal judge as a"home town boy" because he followed the rules and disagreed with you. As I said before if you think he did not follow the rules file charges otherwise it is just another false accusation. Seham got his butt handed to him when he accuses judge Wake of misdeeds.

Very childish calling people of authority names because they don't agree with you.

Hopw many federal judges from around the country not "home toen boys" have agreed with you?

RICO N.C. failed
4th circuit RICO VA. failed

Status quo N.Y. failed

Injunction N.C. failed

Even in your "home town" you can't win.

!!!! CHALLENGE TO ANY FORMER AWA TO ANSWER THIS POST !!!!

It doesn't sound like an AWA "stand-alone" business model carried any less risk than US Airways.

Question to AWA PILOTS: What would be the chances of AWA getting financing in Bankruptcy as a "stand-alone" for their "business model" if the merger HADN'T gone through?

Here is what Doug said. You don't believe him, I know.

Doug Parker Charlotte F/A Crew news 09/2011 stated: "We have filmed it. People can watch it, but that's what happened."

"USAir ‑‑ America West was not in dramatically better shape. While we weren't on the verge of, you know, going away liquidating, as I have said a number of times, I believe without a merger ‑‑ well, let me tell you. By putting the two companies together, a lot of new money came in is the answer to your question.

America West did not have the money to go fund the merger or anything close to it. And, indeed, I think America West standalone ‑‑ this is ‑‑ this gets some America West people upset because, you know, they ‑‑ anyway, whatever reason.

But my view is, and a highly educated view on this point, is that America West would have been bankrupt by the end of 2005.

If you recall, by the end of 2005, Delta and Northwest both filed, and I don't think America West could have ‑‑ I'm pretty sure ‑‑ I'm actually, virtually certain that America West would have filed bankruptcy because we didn't have enough cash to make it through the winter in that environment.

So ‑‑ and then more importantly, as it relates to America West, the reason the merger was so important to America West is America West was an airline that lived off a cost structure advantage.

Much like I describe to US Airways employees now, how we don't have the same revenue generating capabilities as American, Delta, and United, who are bigger than us. America West had that in spades.
A Phoenix hub never had the ability to generate the kind of revenues US Airways did, for example. But the airline survived 25 years by having much lower costs, and those lower costs almost entirely labor based.

So what had happened is, is you, you know, looking around the world, here at US Airways, for example, had gotten its labor costs through two bankruptcies and a lot of pain down to matching America West.

That did not look like a good formula for the America West ‑‑ for America West Airlines. You have an airline now that has, not the same ability to generate revenues, and the same costs as the guys who can generate a lot more revenues than you. Those airlines go away.

So whether or not America West would have filed, you know, in late 2005, like I believe, that airline, I'm certain, wouldn't have been able to stand alone on its own in today's environment. You know, much like Frontier, was very ‑‑ it's very similar I think to America West.
You know, small West Coast, whole ‑‑ entirely labor‑cost‑based cost advantage. And, you know, Frontier went bankrupt. They are still floating around somewhere, but, you know, they are a fifth of the size they used to be. And I think that's the best I think America West could have done on its own.
So the merger helped both of us, and in a huge way. I don't think America West would have made it on its own. I'm certain US Airways wouldn't have. And with the merger, what we were able to do ‑‑ you know, which, again, I ‑‑ I think we should all feel good about ‑‑ we were able to go convince people that, while these two airlines on their own are having trouble, we can put them together and build a real airline, and all we need is cash.
And so will you, Mr. Investor, invest in this?
Now, we found some people who wanted to do that because they didn't want us to go away, like GE, who had a lot of airplanes leased to us, and Airbus, who had a lot of airplanes on order to both companies. So they put in monies because they didn't want to see us go away.
But we found some other, you know, just true equity investors, you know, stockholders that said, yeah, that looks like something that will work. I'll invest in that.
So the money that came to fund the merger didn't exist, and neither airline could have raised it on their own. It only came from the power of the merger.
So the merger saved both of us. So if anybody tells you, We saved you, vice versa, they are wrong. We saved each other. And we saved each other by merging the two companies and building a stronger airline.
And, again, I haven't had to say this in a few years, but I have said it a lot. And the story has been entirely consistent. So it's a little frustrating to me to have to keep saying it because I, like you, get tired of hearing this stuff.
It's just absolutely.
SPEAKER: That's exactly what it was.
MR. PARKER: It's just absolutely inaccurate.
So, anyway, hopefully this will help. We have filmed it. People can watch it, but that's what happened.
 
Call it seniority or longevity, who cares how you split hairs...

....So you call a well respected war hero a terrorist, George Nicolau created that list not west pilots.

P.S.: George Nicolau served as a Navigator in the 8th Air Force from 1944 to 1945 (on his resume). While we all appreciate his service, that does NOT make him a war hero. IMHO we use that term "hero" all too often. I would believe Mr. Nicolau would also agree with my accessment...those that served and died paid the ultimate sacrifice.
 
I believe it takes two sides to make a mess of this magnitude. I'll leave all the completely ridiculous and entirely childish BS to yours = "We stand FIRMLY on legal, moral, & ethical high ground." Sure you do kid!...Umm....Sure you do... 😉

Here's the deal Charlie (Sheen): You're not WINNING!!

SYIC-A
 
!!!! CHALLENGE TO ANY FORMER AWA TO ANSWER THIS POST !!!!



It doesn't sound like an AWA "stand-alone" business model carried any less risk than US Airways.

Question to AWA PILOTS: What would be the chances of AWA getting financing in Bankruptcy as a "stand-alone" for their "business model" if the merger HADN'T gone through?

Here is what Doug said. You don't believe him, I know.

Doug Parker Charlotte F/A Crew news 09/2011 stated: "We have filmed it. People can watch it, but that's what happened."

"USAir ‑‑ America West was not in dramatically better shape. While we weren't on the verge of, you know, going away liquidating, as I have said a number of times, I believe without a merger ‑‑ well, let me tell you. By putting the two companies together, a lot of new money came in is the answer to your question.

America West did not have the money to go fund the merger or anything close to it. And, indeed, I think America West standalone ‑‑ this is ‑‑ this gets some America West people upset because, you know, they ‑‑ anyway, whatever reason.

But my view is, and a highly educated view on this point, is that America West would have been bankrupt by the end of 2005.

If you recall, by the end of 2005, Delta and Northwest both filed, and I don't think America West could have ‑‑ I'm pretty sure ‑‑ I'm actually, virtually certain that America West would have filed bankruptcy because we didn't have enough cash to make it through the winter in that environment.

So ‑‑ and then more importantly, as it relates to America West, the reason the merger was so important to America West is America West was an airline that lived off a cost structure advantage.

Much like I describe to US Airways employees now, how we don't have the same revenue generating capabilities as American, Delta, and United, who are bigger than us. America West had that in spades.
A Phoenix hub never had the ability to generate the kind of revenues US Airways did, for example. But the airline survived 25 years by having much lower costs, and those lower costs almost entirely labor based.

So what had happened is, is you, you know, looking around the world, here at US Airways, for example, had gotten its labor costs through two bankruptcies and a lot of pain down to matching America West.

That did not look like a good formula for the America West ‑‑ for America West Airlines. You have an airline now that has, not the same ability to generate revenues, and the same costs as the guys who can generate a lot more revenues than you. Those airlines go away.

So whether or not America West would have filed, you know, in late 2005, like I believe, that airline, I'm certain, wouldn't have been able to stand alone on its own in today's environment. You know, much like Frontier, was very ‑‑ it's very similar I think to America West.
You know, small West Coast, whole ‑‑ entirely labor‑cost‑based cost advantage. And, you know, Frontier went bankrupt. They are still floating around somewhere, but, you know, they are a fifth of the size they used to be. And I think that's the best I think America West could have done on its own.
So the merger helped both of us, and in a huge way. I don't think America West would have made it on its own. I'm certain US Airways wouldn't have. And with the merger, what we were able to do ‑‑ you know, which, again, I ‑‑ I think we should all feel good about ‑‑ we were able to go convince people that, while these two airlines on their own are having trouble, we can put them together and build a real airline, and all we need is cash.
And so will you, Mr. Investor, invest in this?
Now, we found some people who wanted to do that because they didn't want us to go away, like GE, who had a lot of airplanes leased to us, and Airbus, who had a lot of airplanes on order to both companies. So they put in monies because they didn't want to see us go away.
But we found some other, you know, just true equity investors, you know, stockholders that said, yeah, that looks like something that will work. I'll invest in that.
So the money that came to fund the merger didn't exist, and neither airline could have raised it on their own. It only came from the power of the merger.
So the merger saved both of us. So if anybody tells you, We saved you, vice versa, they are wrong. We saved each other. And we saved each other by merging the two companies and building a stronger airline.
And, again, I haven't had to say this in a few years, but I have said it a lot. And the story has been entirely consistent. So it's a little frustrating to me to have to keep saying it because I, like you, get tired of hearing this stuff.
It's just absolutely.
SPEAKER: That's exactly what it was.
MR. PARKER: It's just absolutely inaccurate.
So, anyway, hopefully this will help. We have filmed it. People can watch it, but that's what happened.

Here's your answer: It doesn't matter. You can not evade your responsibility by changing the union name. We didn't start this, but we will finish it. SYIC-A
 
I disagree. What you're saying assumes moral relativism. We are all individuals and the sum of our individual choices, actions and vocalization, or alternately, the lack thereof, constitutes the morality of the "group". And there IS something more "noble about the west pilots, or any other group of pilots, that they would not do the same, feeling similarly aggrieved and presented with the same 'opportunity'." That "nobility", at least so far, appears to include the judicial branch of our government, which by extension represents the rest of the country.
We are not all the same mindless, choiceless automatons. That is why there is no T-shirt for Easties. As a group, they lack integrity, morality and nobility. Their mothers and fathers would NOT be proud. The West, although far from perfect, would most definitely NOT have done the same thing.

Really? T-shirts....

Therein is the problem. You guys apparently think integrity resides in a Tshirt. Just pop over to the print shop for a slick presentation, then you can magically dress up whoever or whatever and WAH LAH, loser, louse, or pious preacher, they all become one and the same... Integrity T-Shirt powers UNITE. (insert fist bump here).

Sorry, Integrity is transcendent to the outer trappings. Nic dressed up his award in pretty ink and flowery words and thought he was one righteous dude. Fine. But integrity is transcendent to loser, wannabe homo sapiens, including arbitrators. But we have a court system that we have all agreed to follow... because it is transcendent to our little squabbles and finger pointing at each other.

The courts ain't smiling on Nic, Wake, or the West. No windfall enforcement for you. Woerth's Warranty was a worthless white wash which was very costly. No dice.

But if its any consolation, when the SCOTUS finally makes a ruling about what contract is or is not within the wide rage of reasonableness... many day hence.. well, if you don't like their decision, don't bother to accuse them of missing the correct T-Shirt.. after all integrity is transcendent to the SCOTUS too.

So the moral of the story is you do what you think is right. Your opponent does too. And it all works out in the end, unaffected by the T-Shirt you wore. Maybe you could look into Integrity Suspenders.. I have a website.
 
Okay, so we can perhaps agree that both east and west live in glass houses - or more accurately, the same glass house. Now that we've demolished the partition walls, perhaps we should refrain from throwing stones at the load bearing ones.

Stop telling us what the courts have warned us about and begin to focus on what their actual ruling has been, both at the 9th and Silver. The Wake ruling was vacated. Yes the facts may remain for posterity but the next DFR will be before a different jury and perhaps a different judge. If we ever get to that point you will need to prove your case all over again, with the backdrop of several years of hindsight not entirely supportive of many of your claims and which will not be lost on anyone.

You and your lawyers accuse us of a re-do, but you are stuck back in 2007 and refuse to accept reality and move off that point in time. You really like snapshots, whether financial or legal.

Wake would not allow a full and open debate on the fairness of the Nic. You say that Nic didn't need to be fair. I say malarkey. Even ALPA policy assumed a fair and equitable process. Longevity IS seniority at every other union and every time in union history with the exception of ALPA pilot groups these past couple decades.
Here is what Silver had to say about the fairness of the Nicolau award and your unsuccessfully attempt to change the DFR question.

Of course, in negotiating for a particular seniority regime, USAPA must not breach
its duty of fair representation. Accordingly, if USAPA wishes to abandon the Nicolau Award
and accept the consequences of this course of action, it is free to do so. By discarding the
result of a valid arbitration and negotiating for a different seniority regime, USAPA is
running the risk that it will be sued by the disadvantaged pilots when the new collective
bargaining agreement is finalized. An impartial arbitrator’s decision regarding an
appropriate method of seniority integration is powerful evidence of a fair result.
Discarding
the Nicolau Award places USAPA on dangerous ground.

Read that sentence over and over.

The Nicolau was not on trial. the duty to represent the west pilots fairly was. The courts did not to hear any more evidence on the "fairness" of the Nicolau. An neutral arbitrator is all the evidence a court needs.

The east had a chance to file whatever charges against nicolau when the award came out. No fraud was found.


One more time.
An impartial arbitrator’s decision regarding an appropriate method of seniority integration is powerful evidence of a fair result.

Wake, Silver or any court is not going to allow a DFR trial to delve into the "fairness" of the list. That has already been determined.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top