OCT/NOV 2012 US Pilots Labor Discussion

[Pi brat]

HELLO! That didn't work last time!

As I remember the previous "legitimate union objective" was that the pilot group would not ratify a Nic inclusive contract. In 2007(8?) I think that was a pretty dubious claim. It had never been put to the test and since the Addington plaintiffs filed their suit soon afterward, there was little time to do that. Since then 5 years and a half a billion dollars in company proclaimed contract improvements, plus many millions in legal expenses have passed under the bridge. Last year this pilot group had an officer election that was a clear chance to change the direction of this battle and it failed-right along west/east lines, which seems to support the premise. Will that be sufficient proof for DFR II?

 

[jetjok1]

Here we are 11 days after the PBGC filed their report with the court. Yet still no update from the pension committee. Are they ignoring the filing? Fingers in their ears chanting no,no,no?

Where is this secret document that they were going to send out that would prove the single bullet theory that someone was going to jail and huge checks were on the way?




Come on guys you spent $4 million dollars and no on is asking where is the report? Where is the update? Where is the filing? Gullible, damn you guys are gullible.

What difference does it make to you?

 

[luvthe9]

The west is out of money and in debt to the attorneys, most of this guys are robbing their kids piggy banks to try to continue their losing battle, donations are way down, the smart ones know it's over. How much money have you guys taken from your families, how could you have been stupid enough to be part of Fergusons failures.

 

[Pi brat]

Huh. What happened to uhaul? Did he go return the truck?

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

HELLO! That didn't work last time!

IS IT WORKING THIS TIME? Enjoy the island!

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

IF YOU ARE WEST 'DONATE" ALL your paycheck, bet the farm! SUPER TITANAUM WORSHIP YOUR AWE GODS!

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

CLEARDIRECT, if your in "LAW SCHOOL" I would direct my focus on the "RLA" rather than your situation of being really junior! because your trying to steal 20 years is getting very old! MUTATIS!

 

[Move2CLT]

Huh. What happened to uhaul? Did he go return the truck?

CTFD hairPi.

Still heading out there. Maybe we can carpool after I get settled in.

 

[Move2CLT]

Man, that east circle jerk is going full steam.

When you boys stop for a rest, remember that you're no closer to DOH then you were a month ago.

Now back to your jerking.

 

[Move2CLT]

Pursuant to the Court’s resolution of the motions for summary judgment,
IT IS ORDERED Counts I and III of the complaint are dismissed and judgment is
entered in favor of US Airline Pilots Association on Count II of the complaint. US Airline
Pilots Association’s seniority proposal does not breach its duty of fair representation
provided it is supported by a legitimate union purpose.
DATED this 11th day of October, 2012.


This is not what I understood to be proposed. The company got an answer (and not what CG predicted as the "only logical answer" I might add.) How can the company do anything but negotiate now? With the obvious caveat that USAPA is hanging by a thread. USAPA, did you learn from the first DFR case?

Give it a minute and you'll find out.

Expect the company to be filing here shortly.

 

[Pi brat]

Five it a minute and you'll find out.

Expect the company to be filing here shortly.

For what? The got one of the three answers THEY asked for .

 

[Move2CLT]

For what? The got one of the three answers THEY asked for .

The company wanted immunity. Instead they got this:

Thus, the Court cannot grant US Airways prospective immunity from any legal action by the West Pilots.

 

[traderjake]

Sorry Traitor, your to stupid to admit when your wrong. No NIC for you.

I'm smart enough to know the difference between you're and your, I also know the difference between too and to.

When you have a DOH contract that survives a DFR challenge then you can call me stupid.

 

[Pi brat]

The company wanted immunity. Instead they got this:

Thus, the Court cannot grant US Airways prospective immunity from any legal action by the West Pilots.

They asked for 1 OR 2 and if the court couldn't give them one of those THEN 3. She gave them #2. Right?

 

[Zone5]

I'm smart enough to know the difference between you're and your, I also know the difference between too and to.

When you have a DOH contract that survives a DFR challenge then you can call me stupid.

No problem now. I will be looking forward to that day! Until then I will just stick to calling you a traitor.


seajay