What's new

OCT/NOV 2012 US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have. I can't find "The nic is it!...It MUST be the nic!" expressed anywhere. That unquestionably results from my incapacity for "some thought and logic". Perhaps your enlightened guidance as to where that's located would prove useful to all concerned here.................?
But that is not what I said. This is the problem debating you. You are to ignorant to have an intelligent conversation with. You don't listen. You make up what you want to hear.

What I said was the ninth said it was not going to be DOH.

Try and be a little more precise. Judge Silver did not say it had to be the nicolau but she warned usapa that you better have a damn good reason for not using the Nicolau. The company has said it is either the nicolau or a non Nicoolau. They are not saying Nicolau or DOH. Any change to the Nicolau is a non Nicolau. Using the Nicolau list and a single C&R is not the Nicolau and the company and usapa had better have a great excuse (LUP) and be ready to back the up in court that that C&R does not disadvantage the west.
 
That you are an idiot.
Nice. That is helpful.

What did you learn about the west DC? Ready to admit that you were wrong?

The reason I brought Luv into was because he is the one that threw the BS out that the west did not have a DC plan until the east "generously" gave us one.
 
You don't listen. You make up what you want to hear.

What I said was the ninth said it was not going to be DOH.

"...the ninth said it was not going to be DOH." Kindly quote the portion that so states.......?

"You make up what you want to hear." Indeed. "Try and be a little more precise." 😉

PS: Your; "You are to ignorant" should be properly expressed as: You are too ignorant.
 
"...the ninth said it was not going to be DOH." Kindly quote the portion that so states.......?

Free to negotiate, have been for a long time, tried DOH once, still nothing.

Sheesh! I must have slept through the part where a ratified contract was put in place!

So...Which is it now? Free to negotiate?....Or it MUST be the nic? 😉 In case it's escaped you entirely: Those two concepts are mutually exclusive.
 
This is the problem debating you. You are to ignorant to have an intelligent conversation with. You don't listen. You make up what you want to hear.

What I said was the ninth said it was not going to be DOH.

He makes stuff up?! Where did they say that? If they did, and you are so confident, back it up with a quote. Or was that just between you and them in a late night tinfoil hat chat session?
 
"...the ninth said it was not going to be DOH." Kindly quote the portion that so states.......?



Sheesh! I must have slept through the part where a ratified contract was put in place!

So...Which is it now? Free to negotiate?....Or it MUST be the nic? 😉

I had no idea you needed things read back slowly and explained so thoroughly for you to get a grasp.

I'll let you think really hard and see if you can put it together first. I'm trying to teach you easties how to make a bit of effort.
 
Is it the fact that only info you actually make an effort to understand is the crap USAPA spoon feeds you?

Where was usapa even mentioned here? I've obviously and quite incorrectly assumed the discussion involved only court rulings.....?

So...Which is it now? Free to negotiate?....Or it MUST be the nic? "And what explains the lack of a clue on your end?"
 
Where was usapa even mentioned here? I've obviously and quite incorrectly assumed the discussion involved only court rulings.....?

So...Which is it now? Free to negotiate?....Or it MUST be the nic? "And what explains the lack of a clue on your end?"

You guys don't read court rulings so how can you possibly understand any references to them?
 
Wow east. How do you perpetually vomit words onto this web board like that?

No wonder you're not married.

This may come as a shock Move so ready yourself. The world contains many wonderful women who's intelligence far exceeds your own.
 
Nice. That is helpful.

What did you learn about the west DC? Ready to admit that you were wrong?

The reason I brought Luv into was because he is the one that threw the BS out that the west did not have a DC plan until the east "generously" gave us one.

Yeah, I'll be the big man and admit I was wrong about something way back. When I was asking you about why you cared about the PIC I said something like "you didn't even have a pension." What I should have said was that you didn't have a Defined Benefit Pension. But, then I asked you a question. Here ya go:

"Did you have a DC plan or a matching 401k? Until the merger didn't you have to first contribute to your 401k and then the company matched up to 10%? And because of the merger, along with profit sharing that you didn't have, they gave you the 10% without you first contributing?"

How can I be wrong when I'm asking you a question?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top