cactushead-west
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
Its obvious the NIC not only satisfied the company requirements, but also fell into what they thought would be an uninconscionable result. DOH would not have been what Lakefield and Parker would deem fair, proven by what is documented in a letter to employees either just before or after the merger announcement. So, given that management not only accepted, but approve the NIC, I believe Hemmenway's comment of discussions had two meanings.
First, let's get back to the table.
Second, we will start from NIC and go from there.
In my view, that is all I want. Furlough protection. Set as many fences with restrictions as you want. When it comes to downsizing, nothing touches the accepted seniority list.
Ratified or not. It ain't going nowhere.
By the way I'm an FO.
Management will not accept any list but the NIC. Why are we talking about changing it? There is nothing that can satisfy their intentions with regard to seniority implementation better than NIC. This is precisely the type of a ratio that they intended from the get go. It works for them and changing it will ONLY cost the company money.
Want the west to participate? Drop the bs about modifications.
Let's move forward together with the cards we've been handed. Any talk of doh will be dismissed as unachievable and will stagnate any pay/work rule improvements, just like Parker and company want.