What's new

Pilots, Send in those cards

Hold ALPA's feet to the fire. Send in your card and force Prater and his merry band to actually do something about this mess - or else.



ALPA did do something about it. It was called binding arbitration. You agreed to it. You lost it. You are crying about it now.
Get over it or don't let the door hit you on the way out.
 
ALPA did do something about it. It was called binding arbitration. You agreed to it. You lost it. You are crying about it now.
Get over it or don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Golly!! What a refreshingly original notion to post. I can't recall anyone being clever enough to post anything like that during these past three months. I'd be surprised if someone doesn't eventually note the AWA's "Righteous Position", perhaps soon...that's never happened here either.

"You are crying about it now" Sounds more like you're the one doing the "crying".

"Get over it or don't let the door hit you on the way out" Here's one for you to consider in return: Grow Up.
 
ALPA did do something about it. It was called binding arbitration. You agreed to it. You lost it. You are crying about it now.
Get over it or don't let the door hit you on the way out.
"Do I believe in arbitration? I do. But not in arbitration between the lion and the lamb, in which the lamb is in the morning found inside the lion."
Samuel Gompers
 
Golly!! What a refreshingly original notion to post. I can't recall anyone being clever enough to post anything like that during these past three months.
Perhaps it's been posted before because it is correct?

Compare that to the constantly vacillating position of the East, from the "We will go to court to get the Nicolau arbitration overturned if it's the last thing we do and we will win!" position of a few months ago to today's "Well, we'll try to get a new union in here and hope they can do something -- ANYthing -- about the seniority situation, even though our own lawyers are hinting to us that there is not much we can do."
 
Perhaps it's been posted before because it is correct?

Compare that to the constantly vacillating position of the East, from the "We will go to court to get the Nicolau arbitration overturned if it's the last thing we do and we will win!" position of a few months ago to today's "Well, we'll try to get a new union in here and hope they can do something -- ANYthing -- about the seniority situation, even though our own lawyers are hinting to us that there is not much we can do."

"Perhaps it's been posted before because it is correct?"

Or; Perhaps it's constantly posted because it's a brain-dead, comfortable knee-jerk/emotional response from people unwilling to acknowledge the slghtest bit of reality hereabouts. This scenarios'a full-blown nightmare of epic proportions, and whines about: "arbitration"/but St Nic said/my daddy'll beat you up/etc" hasn't budged anyone's position. People are more dug in now than ever.

""Well, we'll try to get a new union in here and hope they can do something -- ANYthing " That's been my positon from day one :up: ..not sure where any "vacillating" enters into anything for me.
 
Perhaps it's been posted before because it is correct?

Compare that to the constantly vacillating position of the East, from the "We will go to court to get the Nicolau arbitration overturned if it's the last thing we do and we will win!" position of a few months ago to today's "Well, we'll try to get a new union in here and hope they can do something -- ANYthing -- about the seniority situation, even though our own lawyers are hinting to us that there is not much we can do."

Opinions are important but your motivation is hate. When I search your posts you are a Flight
Attendant for UAL that hates pilots.

A variety of opinions are helpful, your motivation is not. You do not seek the truth, you seek revenge.
 
Opinions are important but your motivation is hate. When I search your posts you are a Flight
Attendant for UAL that hates pilots.

A variety of opinions are helpful, your motivation is not. You do not seek the truth, you seek revenge.

"you are a Flight Attendant for UAL" You're kidding...aren't you?
 
"Perhaps it's been posted before because it is correct?"

Or; Perhaps it's constantly posted because it's a brain-dead, comfortable knee-jerk/emotional response from people unwilling to acknowledge the slghtest bit of reality hereabouts.
OK, let's back up a bit then.

What is not correct about the concept that East agreed to be bound by the arbitration decision and should now honor their word?
 
Opinions are important but your motivation is hate. When I search your posts you are a Flight
Attendant for UAL that hates pilots.

A variety of opinions are helpful, your motivation is not. You do not seek the truth, you seek revenge.


:huh:
 
Opinions are important but your motivation is hate. When I search your posts you are a Flight
Attendant for UAL that hates pilots.
Your searching skills leave much to be desired.

But let's assume for the moment you are correct, and that I am still just a dumb F/A.

Please point out where my points about the East's legal position have been incorrect. Be specific, provide a basis for your opinion and explain your reasoning, as I have consistently done for my opinions.

A variety of opinions are helpful, your motivation is not. You do not seek the truth, you seek revenge.
Do you have anything to add substantively, or have you just given up, realized I am correct in my posts and so you can only resort to ad hominem attacks?
 
I see all my biggest fans are following me around tonight like lost puppies.

How touching.

Still, though, no one has explained where my reasoning about the East's position is wrong.

That's OK. I understand y'all are frustrated.
 
I see all my biggest fans are following me around tonight like lost puppies.

How touching.

Still, though, no one has explained where my reasoning about the East's position is wrong.

That's OK. I understand y'all are frustrated.

When did you get your law degree sir and where?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top