What's new

Reports of up to 20 wounded in shooting in San Bernardino, California

southwind said:
Why wait! I'll provide a one way ticket for you!
You can't afford it, since you haven't paid off your bet to Kevin.
 
Ifly2 said:
Now, that Right There is Just Out Right Stupid
No one ever blamed the gun
Some believe that tougher gun laws would make a difference in how many or who have access to guns to commit crimes and mass shooting with.
No One ever blamed the gun.
That is a stupid slogan for stupid people.
And once again, avoiding the, ssshhhhhh, words " Islamic Terrorism" , all while bellowing to any who will listen, "Ban guns"!
 
700UW said:
You can't afford it, since you haven't paid off your bet to Kevin.
Buddy pass Sucka ! Now again, keep your nose out of DL business and please burn your IAM pom-poms!
 
southwind said:
And once again, avoiding the, ssshhhhhh, words " Islamic Terrorism" , all while bellowing to any who will listen, "Ban guns"!

How do the words "Islamic Terrorism" fit in a reply to a post about the idiocy of the "blame the gun" slogan?

Blame The Gun is exactly the type of hyperbolic, bombastic, sounds good but totally untrue and nonsensical slogan used by puppeteers everywhere.

When Sharpton or JJ do it, you think they are evil. If Rush or Bill "Killing History" O'Reilly or the rest of your programmers do it, you (collectively...) rush to repeat their BS as some kind of Divinely Inspired Wisdom.

It is not.

It is BS, untrue, and simple-minded.

I have no problem calling the SB attacks Islamic Terrorism, the Charleston massacre of innocents Racially Motivated, or attacks on Planned Parenthood either Christian or Religiously Inspired Terrorism, as the case may be.
 
Ifly2 said:
As for laws, if they do no accomplish any thing, why have any?

Abolish all of them.

Law and Order types seem to think that laws do make a difference, laws like three strikes provisions, and tougher sentences for crimes committed with a gun, and tougher sentences for crimes committed near a school, criminalization of marijuana, even speed limits.

Except when it comes to gun regulations, then laws are irrelevant.

What sense does that make?

Logically, why wouldn't some common sense knowledge and skills requirement combined with a truly universal background check make some difference. Criminals might still have guns. None of the shooters in these "mass shootings" were "criminals" until the shooting. They were all "mentally unstable" - according to the right wing apologists.

No One Ever Blamed The Gun

That is Just Stupid
 
Why is the gun at fault?
I have firearms. I have no desire or inclination to harm anyone other than in a self defensive response.
I've hunted, target shot, carried many times and never once did I have a motive or desire to harm anyone with a firearm.
During my life there have been situations with friends and loved ones who were seriously and grievously wronged and never once was I motivated or inclined to pick up a firearm to right the wrong.
So tell me, why is the gun at fault?
 
Ifly2 said:
How do the words "Islamic Terrorism" fit in a reply to a post about the idiocy of the "blame the gun" slogan?

Blame The Gun is exactly the type of hyperbolic, bombastic, sounds good but totally untrue and nonsensical slogan used by puppeteers everywhere.

When Sharpton or JJ do it, you think they are evil. If Rush or Bill "Killing History" O'Reilly or the rest of your programmers do it, you (collectively...) rush to repeat their BS as some kind of Divinely Inspired Wisdom.

It is not.

It is BS, untrue, and simple-minded.

I have no problem calling the SB attacks Islamic Terrorism, the Charleston massacre of innocents Racially Motivated, or attacks on Planned Parenthood either Christian or Religiously Inspired Terrorism, as the case may be.
 
Really? So they where praising god as they were shooting?
 
Equivalent of something like "allahu akbar"?
 
Stating they were doings gods work?
 
No they did not.
 
You are one twisted soul.
 
The first came from the New York Times:

One person who spoke with [Dear] extensively about his religious views said Mr. Dear, who is 57, had praised people who attacked abortion providers, saying they were doing Gods work. In 2009, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of concerns for the privacy of the family, Mr. Dear described as heroes members of the Army of God, a loosely organized group of anti-abortion extremists that has claimed responsibility for a number of killings and bombings.
The Times reporter also interviewed a close relative of Dears Colorado girlfriend Stephanie Bragg, who said the couple were very religious, read the Bible often and are always talking about scripture. The two reportedly lived in a trailer marked with a small cross, and that Bragg couldnt believe Dear was capable of such things.
Nevertheless, Bragg told the relative she had a theory as to what drove her boyfriend to murder several people in cold blood: He believed he was doing Gods will, and Im sure he probably wanted to die in the process of carrying out what Im sure he thought was right.
Another report from the Charleston Post and Courier claimed that Dear was obsessed with an interpretation of the Christian apocalypse, and used dark, bizarre theology to justify disturbing acts of domestic violence against his ex wife.
 
"Allahu Akbar (Arabic: الله أكبر) is an Islamic phrase, called Takbir in Arabic, meaning "God is greater" or "God is [the] greatest".


How many times have you personally said or sang "God is Great"?

About or in worship of the very same Being?
 
Ifly2 said:
"Allahu Akbar (Arabic: الله أكبر) is an Islamic phrase, called Takbir in Arabic, meaning "God is greater" or "God is [the] greatest".


How many times have you personally said or sang "God is Great"?

About or in worship of the very same Being?
 
 
Proof positive that liberalism is a mental disease. 
 

Latest posts

Back
Top