RowUnderDCA
Veteran
- Oct 6, 2002
- 2,123
- 1
I vote for the "Fascinating Corporate Transaction" or "FCT" for short. It's pronounced with an "uh" sound.
I think you're referring to the 'Fascinating, Unique Corporate Transaction.'
CLT is much smaller and PHL doesn't serve enough of the country to be viable. PIT, anyone?
Pit at its peak actually has, or had, a little more originating traffic than CLT does now. Somehow I just don't see either matching the market the city of ATL provides to just about any airline willing to hub it. In today's world of merger surprises, CLT could find itself being the next PIT in terms of downsize. But I know nothing, just specualtion.
Take care WT, Greeter.
LCC is still the smallest-market hub carrier. This is/has/will be it's biggest disadvantage. This is why the hybrid model might actually make sense as the best option. NW is also a carrier with small/medium market-sized hubs.
DL, UA, CO and AA should continue to focus on the super major markets. Like they say: location, location, location. The reason why LCC has taken the path it has by decimating its employee compensation, I believe, is most rooted in the weakness of its hub markets. Poor management, maybe, but you change management, you can't easily change hub locations.
This is also why the notion of simply flipping a switch and becoming WN was not so easy. U's fixed costs and property holdings would have made such a transition very problematic.
It might still not work to transition LCC into an international, hybrid carrier, but I still think it's about as good as its going to get and it convinced money people (including some without any prior vested interest) to pony up.
Operating South America out of CLT or PHL can never be as lucrative as operating South America out of ATL, JFK or MIA.