U
UAL_TECH
Guest
You have not answered the question. Who's rights are being deprived by granting gays the right to marry? Who am I forcing to abide by my beliefs?
Page #28 of 28 pages.
Do you need a map?

You have not answered the question. Who's rights are being deprived by granting gays the right to marry? Who am I forcing to abide by my beliefs?
Page #28 of 28 pages.
Do you need a map?
![]()
WHY should a lifestyle choice be including with racial preferences?
While many will argue that they were born gay, the truth is that is that any sexuality is a learned behavior based on personal preference.
When you can't get a decent job and feed your family it doesn't matter whether you're black Japanese, Irish or Italian. If you starve to death as a result you aren't any less dead because you were Irish as opposed to black.
Why not include people of Appalachian Origin as a Preferred Minority?
It's hard to find a group that has had it rougher then those who grew up deep in the hils of KY, TN & WV.
You know as well as I do that once the Civil Union, Gay Marriage issue is resolved in favor of Gays and Lesbians the next step will be to garner Preferred Minority status.
Freedom & Liberty flourish when NO ONE has a legal advantage over another based on race, gender or sexual preference
Freedom & Liberty flourish when NO ONE has a legal advantage over another based on race, gender or sexual preference
I've said time and again that I've no problem with civil unions and the semantics behind opposing "Marriage".
Honestly Garfield I don't care who does what with whom behind a closed door and my belief is that it's none of the Governments business.
What I do object to is the whole "Preferred Minority" BS perpetrated by the Federal Government as you can't correct past prejudices by punishing those in the present. I work on a very simple principle that the rights of the individual take precedence over the rights of Governments, political parties, unions and special interest groups.
If Adam & Steve want to enter into a legal binding contract that defines the parameters of their relationship it's their business and I don't have a say and neither should the Government.
One should take note of history in this regard. The Founding Fathers were so fundamentally opposed, even fearful of a theocracy that the word God appears nowhere in the Declaration of Independence.
Legal Scholars who ascribe to the theory of "Original Intent" should be hard pressed to support any law that prevents the individual from exercising all of their freedoms and liberties that the Founding Fathers so effectively created. The fact that this took place at a time that blacks were considered 3/5ths of a person speaks volumes about their foresight and wisdom of those involved. Also keep in mind that women at that time were viewed as property.
Actually it was blacks who were 3/5 of a person. Women were considered property and if you're familiar with the traditional wedding ceremony the phrase "Who Giveth this woman" is evidence dating back to pre Magna Carta days.
When you consider that in 1776 that the above was true then the efforts to create a society free from oppression was a monumental accomplishment given the climate of the times.
It's quite sad that in my lifetime I've seen no leadership at the Presidential level that came anywhere close to the visionaries that created our nation and it's that leadership and vision or actually the lack thereof that will lead us to ruin and it's already started
Do you have any medical documentation to back that up.
And since when was asking for equal treatment under the law 'preferential treatment"?
Nothing that supports what?
Equal treatment is the agenda unless you can show me bills or resolutions that say otherwise.
No. You figured out who I was asking.
Try answering the question.
Do you think what happened to the Irish and Italians is equal to what happened to the Blacks and Japanese and Native Americans?
Garfield. I chose this portion of your quote for a particular reason. I know you are trying in vane to make an argument for "civil unions" for gays......cool...whatever. However, I believe what Piney is trying to get across to you, and you are not comprehending, is the fact that EVERYONE wants some sort of "protected status", or, as you would call it, "equal status". That is all fine and dandy.
Now......back to your quote that I chose. I have no idea of your age, gender, or how you may have been "brought up", so to speak. But, it is surely clear to this poster the ignorance you show with the quote I chose. Being from the Pittsburgh, Pa region, and being of Slovak and Scottish/Irish roots, the statement you made clearly shows your naivete in regards to true American roots, and what built this country into what it is today. Slovaks, Irish, Italian, German, Chinese, and, yes, YOUR infamous use of "blacks", built this country to what it is. Besides blacks and the Japs :unsure: , do you realize how these Ethnic Minorities I mentioned were treated at the time??? Working in steel mills/coal mines for 12-16 hours a day, EVERY day? Given the worst of jobs, living in Company housing, paid by Company script to shop for everything at Company "stores"? Treated like manure.
Japs?...."Native Americans"?.......Blacks?....Were there injustices along the way?? Yes there was. Are we a perfect country?......Probably not......Nothing is perfect. Where is the United Slovak, Italian, Irish, German, Russian.....WHITE college fund???? That would go over real good!
Enough of the America is a bad country crap!! This is the greatest country on Earth.......you have not a good thing to say about it!
If you want a good history lesson....read a book....called... Out of this Furnace. You may learn a great deal of what people before you had to do to SURVIVE....and PROSPER in this great USA.....without whining about "quotas"....or, "equal treatment".
MOD Gods.......I proved my worthyness :angry: