ch53D
Senior
- Jan 21, 2007
- 260
- 3
An edited for language version of Lorenzi's rantings.
I believe this letter could be deamed a rule 32 violation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An edited for language version of Lorenzi's rantings.
<_< -------This is a prim example of lack of leadership by the Union (International). You have multiple locals going off in all different directions with no central authority coordinating the Unions direction! At least the IAM had it's "District" that served that purpose, between the Locals and international!-------- Now please don't think this as an indorsment for the IAM! It's not meant to be!
Matt says that AFW will be the swing vote. Swing vote of what? Closing of MCI? COLA? If so, which way? For or against? The letter, although passionate in nature, comes at a time when "in-house" fighting is just what the company wants. Hopefully, this will cease.
<_< --------- No man! What I am suggesting is that everyone get on the same page!HUH?
Local Autonomy is the staple of the AMFA Consitution.
Do you suggest the TWU International Dictate that TWU Local 567 stay in "working together" game?
You guys should never under estimate the power of the TWU time bomb truth.
Kirk Wells no longer works for AA, but before he left, I heard the truth directly from his mouth and he understands why dissidents exist within the TWU.
I myself was a TWU Bubba-leiver. And once educated, learned the truth and the negatives of the TWU.
Never under estimate the truth being exposed when it comes to the TWU.
Never count out any member as potential leader to remove the TWU. Instead of attacking and alienating the stooges, educate them and embrace their mis-understanding.
Only then will the TWU be removed from AA property.
<_< ---------Hey! Just before Contract talks is no time to be starting brush fires in your own front yard!!!!Lets put things in perspective. Matt Lorenzi is not a friend of the Line Mechanic and has personally told me so in 2003. He is upset today and let everyone know it. When he gets what he wants he will be Local 514 and 530 best friend again. His rants are not be believed to be credible in the nature of unionism. He is just crying foul because his feelings got hurt!
Lets put things in perspective. Matt Lorenzi is not a friend of the Line Mechanic and has personally told me so in 2003. He is upset today and let everyone know it. When he gets what he wants he will be Local 514 and 530 best friend again. His rants are not be believed to be credible in the nature of unionism. He is just crying foul because his feelings got hurt!
<_< --------- No man! What I am suggesting is that everyone get on the same page!
That is correct, it's all about Matt and only Matt.I think Chuck is correct here.
From what I have heard, Matt is for Matt and nobody else.
<_< ---------Hey! Just before Contract talks is no time to be starting brush fires in your own front yard!!!!
I'm sure a few rule 32 charges will be filed on Matt, afterall he is not well liked.It will be interesting to see if someone complains about his language and invokes Article 32.
Did you idiots think for a minute that
management is going to continue to keep you dip#### open, after your
antiquated ###es have been a drag on the operation for YEARS (after all, all
you are is a contraceptive mistake from an “acquisitionâ€!!!
<_< -------Oh yea! That one will definitely bit him in the tail feathers!!!! :down: It would be just one more thing to point to in a discrimination law suit!I'm sure a few rule 32 charges will be filed on Matt, afterall he is not well liked.
This quote about the guys in KC might come back to bite him: