TheLarkAscending
Veteran
Oddly enough, :wacko: has not responded to this topic with the predictable: "Click here for the comment" hyperlink. Rather strange and out of character
, isn't it? I'm adding my 'bump' for Jim & Clue.
US Airways CEO hints more airline consolidation may be ahead
- Thread starter USA320Pilot
- Start date
Oddly enough, :wacko: has not responded to this topic with the predictable: "Click here for the comment" hyperlink. Rather strange and out of character
, isn't it? I'm adding my 'bump' for Jim & Clue.
legacy-to-LCC
Veteran
- Feb 20, 2004
- 778
- 2
if he is out of tea leaves, than you are out of oreo crumbs...both are highly unlikely!!!He is checking his "Sources" as he is fresh out of tea leaves
ClueByFour
Veteran
Get your answer yet?
It's not as if the poster can't see it--I think someone else was correct in the assesment of "hit and run" tactics.
hp_fa
Veteran
- Feb 19, 2004
- 3,290
- 178
Ya think???
Ardenian
Advanced
USA320 is likely conferring with the Merger Committee on how many furloughed pilots will need to be stapled to the bottom of the merged list to allow him to remain captain.
I saw him at an MEC meeting once, running in fear when a member of his "RC4" approached him.
Back to the top it is!
ClueByFour
Veteran
Expect a PM demanding name and # in short order.
Walmartgreeter
Veteran
"USA320 is likely conferring with the Merger Committee on how many furloughed pilots will need to be stapled to the bottom of the merged list to allow him to remain captain."
USA320, simply, is not a player in the business of the current U MEC or it's pilot group. Greeter (and I know you are joking)
USA320, simply, is not a player in the business of the current U MEC or it's pilot group. Greeter (and I know you are joking)
OP
USA320Pilot
Veteran
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #75
Lark posted BoeingBoy’s comments in another thread and I responded.
What I find interesting when thinking about character is that my comments made on a private message board that is password protected, which BoeingBoy posted in a public forum without my permission and may be an ALPA violation, were made "tongue in cheek."
These sarcastic comments were made to illustrate the destructive nature of the RC4 because they were on a path to obtain a TA greater than the company's "ask".
Everybody knows I agreed with the ALPA president, every ALPA financial and legal advisor, every MEC officer and 2/3 of the MEC to limit the damages of LOA 93 versus the partial comments linked to me by BoeingBoy's continued misrepresentation.
Finally, the ALPA EIS Committee purges the message board and although I no longer participate in that forum, I suspect the comments were still not on the message board and BoeingBoy obtained them from an archive.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
What I find interesting when thinking about character is that my comments made on a private message board that is password protected, which BoeingBoy posted in a public forum without my permission and may be an ALPA violation, were made "tongue in cheek."
These sarcastic comments were made to illustrate the destructive nature of the RC4 because they were on a path to obtain a TA greater than the company's "ask".
Everybody knows I agreed with the ALPA president, every ALPA financial and legal advisor, every MEC officer and 2/3 of the MEC to limit the damages of LOA 93 versus the partial comments linked to me by BoeingBoy's continued misrepresentation.
Finally, the ALPA EIS Committee purges the message board and although I no longer participate in that forum, I suspect the comments were still not on the message board and BoeingBoy obtained them from an archive.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
Similar threads
