The only reason 767jetz is on this thread is that he likes where he might fit in if the Nic lives. He is hoping to jump into the mix with the Nic in place.
Hey, did you see that United was listed as one of the top companies predicted to file for bankruptcy. Your company doesn't look very viable

...
You're kidding, right? I guess you missed all the times I posted that the last thing I want, (or any UA employee for that matter) is to "jump into the mix" with US Airways. It was the pilots and other labor groups of UA that presured the BOD to reconsider any merger with US. Please get your facts straight.
Hey, did you see that United was listed as one of the top companies predicted to file for bankruptcy. Your company doesn't look very viable

...
I saw the article you are referring to. The chances were 1 in 2 for AA and 1 in 4 for UA. So looks like AA is twice as likely to file for BK than UA. And US was not even mentioned. Probably because the article was referring to LARGE companies, not just airlines.
Here are some interesting articles for you, since you brought up the subject...
From the Wall Street Journal:
US Airways Falls 16% As Oil Rises
"Rising fuel costs continued to weigh particularly hard on airline stocks with US Airways Group falling 16% to 2.69 on the New York Stock Exchange. "When shares are trading at these levels, people are factoring in that the company is nearing bankruptcy," said Michael Derchin, an analyst with FTN Midwest Securities, referring to the Phoenix company trading below $3."
From Market Watch:
'08 Fuel Bill Raises New Concerns
"Shares of U.S. Airways declined as much as 20% on Thursday on concerns the carrier's jet fuel bill could push the company into bankruptcy."
From the Charlotte Business Journal:
Another Bankruptcy For US Airways?
"US Airways Group Inc. could be headed for for its third bankruptcy in seven years. "US Airways is not in a great position," says Brian Nelson, an airline analyst at Morningstar Inc. "Bankruptcy is certainly a possibility."
----------------------------------------------
BTW, it is you people with your constant attacks on anyone who offers a comment or opinion that doesn't comply with your view, and your inaccurate posts, and attack of others that invites everyone one else to come here and refute your claims. Once again, it was not me who brought up the subject of UA in a US Forum, nor was it me who brought up bankruptcies or call signs for that matter.
The issue is not THAT you post, the issue is WHERE you post.
As I've already said, this seems to be where all the drama is. It is also where my friends, whom I support, discuss the issues of their integration with the East. It is also the place where many love to bring up my airline. Again, public board, freedom of speech, everyone has an opinion. yadda. yadda. yadda. I think I'll continue to post where the discussions that interest me take place. OK?
Also, this thread is not really about call signs. It's about US Airways Pilot labor issues. And your interest in that would be....?
Never said this thread was about call signs. But seeing as you guys were snipping back and forth for more than a page, I thought I add my 2 cents. Of course the usual suspects demonstrate that any view besides their own will not be tolerated.
As for my interest... Right now (since the US/UA merger is off) not much more than entertainment value. Being off on an occupational injury with my leg in the elevated position much of the time leads to much free time in front of the laptop.
767jetz
You have no sense of humor.
Perhaps you missed the humor of my comparing USAviation seniority to pilot seniority. Or the humor of pointing out a person's posting history and batting average.
I did catch your humor, and I'm sure you caught mine. Sometimes humor is difficult to deliver without the help of tone and inflection. Anyway, at least we agree that a call sign is a ridiculous hill on which to make a stand. Keep in mind that this whole volley started with my comments directed at someone who actually claimed that a call sign
IS important to pilots.