Here’s my take on the AOL pamphlet:
It is quality printed and easy to read.
After my first read I came to the conclusion that is aimed at the senior east pilots in hopes of getting them to join the west in forcing a contract vote with the Nicolau award in it prior to the conclusion of the legal battles.
Although the numbers were highlighted for the A330 captains, every single pilot at this company has lost big money over this fight.
Just as USAPA does, AOL uses select numbers and stats to highlight their point of view. For example:
1) It uses ALPA’s proposed pay rate for the computations, not the Kirby or even an average of the two.
2) It talks about the few number of captains that will be gained, but ignores those that have upgraded since Nicolau’s award and that even if they don’t lose their captain seats to west pilots that are senior to the on the Nic award and cannot hold a captain or wide body F/O bid, they would probably be stagnate at those positions for years.
3) They state “This calculation clearly shows that over 3400 US Airways pilots are being held hostage by USAPA so that 87 East pilots can upgrade into Captain seats they wouldn’t have had under separate operations or the Nicolau award”. Well, I don’t see anyone being held hostage. There are methods for overcoming what is going on with USAPA and I haven’t seen ANY effort to change the direction. The only real voice I hear are from those that have refuse to become MIGS and therefore have NO VOICE in the proceedings. The converse of this statement could be that the west pilots are holding 5000 pilots hostage over 87 Captain upgrades by fighting it relentlessly and prematurely in the courts, couldn’t it?
4) This statement is funny to me: “Under the Nicolau Award, the average East First Officer upgrade under attrition alone would be delayed by no more than 1.5 to 2 years while the average West First Officer upgrade would be delayed by 7 years under DOH”. Only 2 years after the 22 or so they have already been waiting? J They also don’t mention that the C&Rs would help those west F/Os, while the Nic has no C&Rs. Or that even though the west might be delayed, they are being delayed more now with the west’s legal fight. Or, that even though they slide on a DOH list, they will retire at a higher relative position, on a much larger list, with more opportunities than they would have on a west stand alone list-just not as much better as they would have under Nic.
5) They state that 100% of the west pilots lose with DOH. Define lose. With C&Rs with top west pilots would not have very senior east pilots coming on top of them in their base on the first bid.
6) They show how west pilots drop with a west only list to DOH, but don’t show how they gain form a west only list to Nic. Most east pilots had a slight gain in relative position on day one of the Nic, but have already dropped in relative position with east only vs. Nic and it gets worse every year we go on.
7) They say “This case us about the ability of ANY entity, including USAPA, to violate an arbitrated decision.” I thought the Addignton was failed for USAPA supposed failure to fairly represent the west pilots, not to uphold the sanctity of arbitration. Which is it?
So, the bottom-line for me is that I agree with the premise that this had turned out to be a tragic loss for all of us, I don’t agree with all of their conclusions. Our leaders have failed us at many turns along the way and I’m afraid we are on the straight stretch that doesn’t allow any options but that to let the courts decide the total winner. Even then we will all have lost.
Since we are on the road with no room to turn around or anymore forks in the road, I wish all sides would do what is necessary to quickly get to the end and let's get a contract put out for a vote.