toganoflex
Veteran
- Apr 27, 2008
- 557
- 381
Post it.
US Pilots Labor Thread 3/11-3/18 OBSERVE THE RULES
- Thread starter Richard
- Start date
- Status
E
EastUS
Guest
"no relevancy"? = Is that why you couldn't simply answer them? I see.
The entitlement mentality at it's very finest. Instead of accepting even the slightest responsibility, overt and obvious greed's "justified" by deflection via supposed "apples and oranges", while, on ANY moral basis; a year worked and lived can be directly and reasonably equated to a year worked and lived by anyone else, unless we presume ourselves immortal or otherwise very "special" indeed. I'd advise against maintaining that entitlement nonsense throughout anyone's life, but all have to make their own choiices I suppose.
E
EastUS
Guest
I've no need for any "closer read" of your postings, now or in any future time. You stated that if those two are men of "integrity", that they wouldn't lend themselves to testifying in this case. You've clearly some difficulty processing the "actual deeds or accomplishments" concept?, OK =I submit that actual deeds, perfomed very well indeed, and under the truest type of test in what life and circumstances sometimes afford, completely give the lie to your patronizing and utterly childish BS. "Integrity" is doing the right things when things aren't at all goiing "right" and regardless of potential cost to one's self, a lesson you would do well to someday learn. Smarmy, arrogant BS hardly affords ANYONE the slightest bit of even imaginable "Integrity".,,regardless of how many times it's perversely shouted as some adolescent slogan. Fantasizing about self=ascribed "Integrity" is one thing. Demonstrating actual class and integrity's entirely different.
As for your "What does that have to do with the case?" I'd further submit that, for the sake of your west's, and I quote "Righteous Position"...you had certainly better hope that it has nothing at all to do with any case, After all; aren't these among the people you feel your 11 years should be worth 21 or more of theirs?..and you imagine that you've so much more "Integrity" than?
It'd be interesting to see what jurors might think on that score, should any of this be admissable in any way.toganoflex
Veteran
- Apr 27, 2008
- 557
- 381
Unlike your writing style, your logic is an oversimplification of a complex process. You think because you worked so many years at Airways that you're entitled to higher position on the integrated list just because you've been around.
You completely fail to take into account the fact that I had attained a certain seniority level at my airline and the fact that you would have been on the street long before I possibly would have had this merger not happened.
And I think you and I both know how "a year worked and lived can be directly and reasonably equated to a year worked and lived by anyone else" would have gone over at your next airline gig when trying to explain why you shouldn't start at the bottom again.
Sorry, nice try. But this merger produced a new airline and a new list. Your time counts for very little.
toganoflex
Veteran
- Apr 27, 2008
- 557
- 381
You should start heeding your own advice.
E
EastUS
Guest
"Your time counts for very little". While your very little time counts for everything. Thank you. See?....There really isn't anything at all complex within any such thought processes.
toganoflex
Veteran
- Apr 27, 2008
- 557
- 381
I say again - no relevance. And Wake seems to agree with me.
"This jury trial will only address the liability facts underlying
Plaintiffs’ class action. An additional bench trial will adjudicate any injunction-specific
facts shortly thereafter, and any monetary relief owing to the named plaintiffs and/or the
class could be dealt with in subsequent proceedings."
toganoflex
Veteran
- Apr 27, 2008
- 557
- 381
See, once again you fail to see the big picture. By looking at more than your time, you enter into other areas like slotting and relative seniority where the complexity of integration comes into play.
Your time at the old US Airways plays only a small, or very little, part in the integration.
E
EastUS
Guest
I'm very fortunate in that my "big picture" exceeds the range of my shaving mirror. It's quite evident that such isn't the case with many. Enough said.
Phoenix
Veteran
- Apr 16, 2003
- 8,584
- 7,430
Ok. And you offered your sage reflection for free?!
But what we really need to know is your prediction for the going price of tea in China next month.
Oh... "no relevance".
This is like watching tennis. 
cleardirect
Veteran
- May 24, 2008
- 6,234
- 9,749
- Banned
- #191
Your posts have become tiresome, insulting and repetitive. I believe that you are going to be extremely disappointed and surprised with the outcome and ruling in the DFR case. Trying to have an intelligent debate with you is a waste of time.I've no need for any "closer read" of your postings, now or in any future time. You stated that if those two are men of "integrity", that they wouldn't lend themselves to testifying in this case. You've clearly some difficulty processing the "actual deeds or accomplishments" concept?, OK =I submit that actual deeds, perfomed very well indeed, and under the truest type of test in what life and circumstances sometimes afford, completely give the lie to your patronizing and utterly childish BS. "Integrity" is doing the right things when things aren't at all goiing "right" and regardless of potential cost to one's self, a lesson you would do well to someday learn. Smarmy, arrogant BS hardly affords ANYONE the slightest bit of even imaginable "Integrity".,,regardless of how many times it's perversely shouted as some adolescent slogan. Fantasizing about self=ascribed "Integrity" is one thing. Demonstrating actual class and integrity's entirely different.
As for your "What does that have to do with the case?" I'd further submit that, for the sake of your west's, and I quote "Righteous Position"...you had certainly better hope that it has nothing at all to do with any case, After all; aren't these among the people you feel your 11 years should be worth 21 or more of theirs?..and you imagine that you've so much more "Integrity" than?
Something more entertaining will be to count how many insulting adjectives and phrases you can incorporate into your rambling posts.
Starting with this one. Six words and two insulting phrases. But only one smiley face. You have a nice day. I look forward to the impending east meltdown.
Phoenix
Veteran
- Apr 16, 2003
- 8,584
- 7,430
How unoriginal. It appears you are just cutting and pasting from "Easthole" posts?!
Edward
Veteran
Folks:
Go back & reread post 1 BEFORE you make another post in this thread.
Posts have been removed & the next step is time off.
Go back & reread post 1 BEFORE you make another post in this thread.
Posts have been removed & the next step is time off.
E
EastUS
Guest
"I look forward to the impending east meltdown" A most charitable "thought" indeed, but I can certainly understand. That "meltdown" has been long overdue to happen, from ALL west accounts, for at least two years now. I'd suggest simply not reading any posts that trouble you in any way, and availing yourself of some fresh popcorn at the very least. if you've some need to take yourself and all this all-so-very-seriously...well..,just realize that it's not a universal affliction. I get stuck at the keyboard a lot for business reasons, and poking holes in west hot air balloons is merely a diversion. Nothing said around "here" is going to make any difference. Go out and enjoy your life.
Harry Callahan
Veteran
" Nothing said around "here" is going to make any difference. Go out and enjoy your life.
As some one who has no dog in your alls fight EastUS has hit the nail on the head here. Life is way to short.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
