nevergiveup
Veteran
- Nov 30, 2010
- 2,125
- 2,148
She can google!Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand......Mark Twain.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She can google!Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand......Mark Twain.
Separate contracts after 7 years.Not the SCOTUS...I am Nic4us..an anonymous web poster quoting the SCOTUS.
Here are the relevant cases..
VACA v. Sipes
ford Motor Company v. Huffmann
ALPA international v. O'Neil.
A union breaches it's DFR if it's actions are either "arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith". And the wide range of reasonableness must conform to the political landscape at the time of the decision.
That last part is what kills usapa. Absolutely no LUP, and using 2012 data to make an argument that by stealing West positions over the last 7 years with usapa's self hostage taking somehow justifies the ends of stealing all the West positions is laughable.
Trusteeship WAS used against the PHL LEC.Arguing ALPA merger policy no longer applies or should be modified will fit quite nicely
"You aren't capable of knowing or telling the truth are you?"
Happy now?
I'm not your son, if I was I would have had you declared incompetent long ago.
I can offer a suggestion, use the Nic in section 22, otherwise pound sand.
And he would not get you hired at Piedmont like your Daddy did. Run along little Danny.
Not the SCOTUS...I am Nic4us..an anonymous web poster quoting the SCOTUS.
What support will the west offer for that? I'm sure that all concerned would be interested in any suggestions you have for obtaining a ratifiable and worthwhile contract "that included DOH / DOH-lite".....? It seems in your best interests to seek one, since you can then be "off to the races" with your legal crusade. Any ideas? Hint = Snide, smarmy and stupid fail to much impress at any level.
No support what so ever.
The Nicolau is the middle ground. It is the compromise.
BTW, the West has done nothing wrong.
Separate contracts after 7 years.
Those cases don't support YOUR arguments, that's for sure.
I can also offer a suggestion. Go piss yourself you freakn scab. LMAO.
Actually they have done a few things.
They held info picketing to be laughed at by the media.
They sued in the NYC court, to be laughed at by the federal court.
They started an illegal job action, and although the company was not laughing, the West most certainly was....
Now they plead to the NMB...it is like going to a comedy club...after you have laughed hard for a while...it gets old and your stomach starts to hurt.
I'd covered such enlightened "thoughts" previously: "A handfull of actually reasonable and rational people in the right places and times would/could/should have prevented the whole thing from ever happening." You ain't one such.
It is the Nic, to it's terms, end of story.
DOH (really longevity but you didn't want any part of that either) IS the standard from which ALL seniroity lists are measured: there has never been a case where a DOH/longevity list has been found to be arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith....period. That IS a LUP.And whose fault is that?
My argument is that usapa and the company are both seeking to prolong separate ops.
The company to avoid higher pilot cost, and usapa to avoid the inevitable implementation of the Nic.
Hey, just reread the TA and both the company and usapa are in violation. It seems it has been 7 years and still no operational pilot integration. You do realize it is against the law to strip workers of their right to organize?
And, my references do support my arguments. Got a good faith LUP for reneging on binding arbitration? Doubt it, as the term good faith would imply one would actually live up to a contractual agreement. Got evidence why stapling the West is neither arbitrary or discriminatory?