nevergiveup said:
Perhaps Cactuspilot can get some of his longshoreman buddies to have a talk with him!
3 lists currently in effect.
LOS....probable
DOH....very possible
NIC....(ever heard of New Coke?)
LOS....ever heard of the New Coke?
DOH...ever heard of the New Coke?
NIC...have you figured it out yet?
USAPA LLC's update is quite comical. Our seeming intention? Get a clue.
"At the hearing in the Preliminary Arbitration and in subsequent communications, the former America West pilots have indicated their seeming intention to predicate their proposal for integrating seniority based on an updated Nicolau list. We do not believe such a proposal is consistent with the RLA status quo at US Airways, with McCaskill-Bond, with the MOU or the Protocol Agreement or with the decisions of the United States District Court in Arizona. Nor do we believe such a proposal is in the best interests of US Airways pilots. The APA America West Merger Committee is free to make whatever proposal it wants, but whatever it proposes is just that a proposal nothing more. We are fully prepared to oppose any proposal that attempts to integrate the pilots of the New American Airlines in any manner that is not fair and equitable."
The West pilots have never indicated anything other than a position we held with the founding of Leonidas.
Leonidas LLC Objectives
"We, the former pilots of America West Airlines, hereby declare the following:
We fully demand all of our legal rights, in their entirety, within the new US Airways, or any successor airline.
We require full, good faith compliance with our existing contract, the Transition Agreement and ALPA merger policy from all parties.
We will not allow our rights to be trod upon by USAPA, the East MEC, ALPA National, or theCompany.
We will aggressively seek any and all available legal remedies against any party which mightseek to dilute our rights.
We will not tolerate discrimination against the pilots of America West in any form, including the dilution of the Nicolau Award by any means, contractual or otherwise.
We will not engage in fruitless debates over matters already settled.
We will remain perpetually poised to aggressively defend our rights until such time when we
are no longer threatened."
Didn't USAPA LLC indicate in court that "fair and equitable" means whatever an arbitrator says? Wouldn't that indicate they will object to their own testimony?
Good luck in arbitration.