What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Metroyet said:
Claxon is a bi-polar idiot. If there is an agreed upon combined seniority list, it only happens if the West Merger Committee agrees. Period. No one is dictating the seniority list like the Azzhole East pilots attempted to do...and failed. The APA is powerless,  the FBA fake union, LLC non profit Elks Club in NC is utterly powerless, and the West Committee is along for the ride as well. It matters who has the best argument. I don't think the West has any competition in that arena. You know, "powerful evidence of a fair result" and all. :lol:
View attachment 10658

Yes, his posts make sense now 😉
 
EastCheats said:
attachicon.gif
image.jpg
Yes, his posts make sense now 😉
Here is one for you and Metroyet.



Over the past few U-Turns, we’ve noticed a change in the tone of comments we’ve received. Maybe the reality of what we are up against is finally sinking in. Some accused us of taking the quotes from the Freund rebuttal out of context. We didn’t. We’ve had requests for copies of Jeff Freund’s actual East Vs West court documents. The file is too big to be directly cut and pasted. We can forward it in a scanned PDF-ZIP/Scan format. Just email us. Remember, we have no website, no budget and receive no donations. Maybe someone will paste it as an attachment on the AWAPPA web board for all to view. We would do it ourselves, but we’ve all been banned from the AWAPPA web board since May.

We have also received additional comments on what happened at Wye River from both sides. While our initial reporting appears to be correct and consistent with the latest accounts, it was incomplete. Here’s additional information from both sides.

According to our reports, on Day One of Wye River, Jeff Freund warned the West MEC that if USAPA won, the West risked losing everything. He urged reaching an agreement. He was gone on Day Two. We won’t address his motivation for leaving.
As Jeff Freund observed in his rebuttal to the East MEC lawsuit, the NIC was not in stone. And the loss of ALPA put it in real trouble. At least ALPA had the obligation, through the ALPA Merger Policy, to attempt to get the company to use the NIC Award.

ALPA’s lawyers knew the list was negotiable, but they never told either rank and file. We attended last summer’s ALPA road shows in PHX, starring Paul Rice and a cast of ALPA attorneys. Did ALPA ever hint that the NIC was negotiable? We believe it was for fear of fanning the flames and drawing more support for USAPA that Herndon kept that from us. They did tell all the Wye River attendees the reality. One side listened, the other didn’t.

In last summer’s East Vs West lawsuit, the East used ALPA DUES MONEY and an ALPA-Approved attorney, Roland Wilder, to pursue the case. As far as we can determine, we had to use our own Merger Fund money to defend ourselves. Thanks for choosing sides, ALPA! In the likely event that the NIC will be trashed in a single contract, it will be our own voluntary contributions that will have to be raised for a DFR lawsuit. USAPA expects it, so we shouldn’t disappoint them. This could be an extremely costly effort that could drag on for years. U-Turn is not discouraging filing a DFR, and we need closure.

Jeff Freund is a top-notch lawyer. We have no doubt that he told our MEC the truth about how negotiable the NIC really was. The question is: why didn’t CJ, Bendett, et al, listen? We figure that they either didn’t believe him or after all their hairy-chested resolutions and hotlines, they were afraid to back down. What good are attorneys if you don’t take their advice?

There is one other possibility. We mentioned it in a previous U-Turn. Our union leaders believed that the USAPA vote would be close (razor’s edge, to quote one of them) and that it was worth holding out and rolling the dice, figuring that if ALPA survived, so would the NIC. Too bad ALPA didn’t explain the importance of the 30% of East pilots who refused to participate in the Wilson Polling.

We now have a better picture what the East MEC had on the table: an 8 year fence, furloughs by longevity (LOS), MDA time not counting for longevity, Dave O’Dell having 400 pilots below him, and the Nic surviving as THE LIST. Yes, the East offered the NIC. They just wanted to protect their retirement attrition, which stalled by the change in Age-60. Looking back, that offer must look like a home run to any West pilot right now, but last February the EAST MEC and ALPA couldn’t get to first base with it.

Our former MEC and our union leadership played a very high stakes game of poker by not dealing at Wye River. Freund was right, we were risking everything…..and right now, it looks like we lost. They need to take responsibility for that.

U-Turn
 
“In the US Airways – America West case, it went to binding arbitration but there was a requirement as part of that that the two unions negotiate a joint contract with the company, which wasn’t done yet.

And because it wasn’t done yet, the side that didn’t like it could prevent a joint contract from getting done. And because of that, the seniority integration never happened."

Scott Kirby
 
EastCheats said:
Furious? Oh, the horror!
Our sources have told us..the sources in Claxon's head fed to you most likely.. :lol:

Actually came from your side D-head.
 
traderjake said:
Have you ever admitted you were wrong about the West getting a Merger Committee? 
 
There are three seniority lists and three Merger Committees, are you still claiming USAPA LLC represents the West seniority list?
 
How powerful is the putative west merger committee?   Apart from arbitration pursuant to the protocol agreement, it is impotent.  
 
Does MB acknowledge "merger committees" or does it acknowledge "craft or classes" in a "covered transaction"? Nope.  No mention of "merger committees".  In the Protocol Agreement "merger committees" are not granted the rights of a "craft or class" pursuant to MB.  Accordingly, nothing prevents APA and USAPA from signing an SLI agreement for all the "covered employees" of the "covered transaction", pursuant to MB.  Nothing.  Sure, there would be consequences of doing so, mostly endless litigation....
 
And that would be quite humorous.   Litigation.... Just imagine if the APA were to consider what happened to West pilots when they were pissed, sued, and got furloughed, while they fought in the court to get their own way.  Shame. Shame.  Could the APA follow the example of USAPA, follow the letter of the law, and benefit from the West pilots going to court, thus forcing separate lists...all while the 787 and 350 are delivered, and the 777s and 767s remain completely theirs during massive retirements...
 
Yes, the APA could.  Nobody holds their pen.  They have done worse (allegedly in the eyes of some, but not in the eyes of the courts) and come out smelling like a rose.   
 
Marty and his merry band routinely rely on "implicit assumptions" in their strategy.  They should just accept the axiom that you might be right but it might cost you less to negotiate...   "The time value of seniority".... 😀   
 
The APA would never do that to get ahead, I would guess.  But "would" and "could" aren't the same thing, and with the APA, history shows there is no telling what they will actually do... and implicit assumptions won't be helpful to anyone, especially AOL.     
 
 
 
 
Labor Integration
Pub. L. 110–161, div. K, title I, §117, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2382, provided that:
“(a) Labor Integration.—With respect to any covered transaction involving two or more covered air carriers that results in the combination of crafts or classes that are subject to the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.), sections 3 and 13 of the labor protective provisions imposed by the Civil Aeronautics Board in the Allegheny-Mohawk merger (as published at 59 C.A.B. 45) shall apply to the integration of covered employees of the covered air carriers; except that—
“(1) if the same collective bargaining agent represents the combining crafts or classes at each of the covered air carriers, that collective bargaining agent's internal policies regarding integration, if any, will not be affected by and will supersede the requirements of this section; and
“(2) the requirements of any collective bargaining agreement that may be applicable to the terms of integration involving covered employees of a covered air carrier shall not be affected by the requirements of this section as to the employees covered by that agreement, so long as those provisions allow for the protections afforded by sections 3 and 13 of the Allegheny-Mohawk provisions.
“( B) Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:
“(1) Air carrier.—The term ‘air carrier’ means an air carrier that holds a certificate issued under chapter 411 of title 49, United States Code.
“(2) Covered air carrier.—The term ‘covered air carrier’ means an air carrier that is involved in a covered transaction.
“(3) Covered employee.—The term ‘covered employee’ means an employee who—
“(A) is not a temporary employee; and
“( B) is a member of a craft or class that is subject to the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.).
 
 
Phoenix said:
How powerful is the putative west merger committee?   Apart from arbitration it is impotent.  
 
Does MB acknowledge "merger committees" or does it acknowledge "craft or classes" in a "covered transaction"? Nope.  No mention of "merger committees".  In the Protocol Agreement "merger committees" are not granted the rights of a "craft or class" pursuant to MB.  Accordingly, nothing prevents APA and USAPA from signing an SLI agreement for all the "covered employees" of the "covered transaction", pursuant to MB.  Nothing.  Sure, there would be consequences of doing so, mostly endless litigation....
 
And that would be quite humorous.   Litigation.... Just imagine if the APA were to consider what happened to West pilots when they were pissed, sued, and got furloughed, while they fought in the court to get their own way.  Shame. Shame.  Could the APA follow the example of USAPA, follow the letter of the law, and benefit from the West pilots going to court, thus forcing separate lists...all while the 787 and 350 are delivered, and the 777s and 767s remain completely theirs during massive retirements...
 
Yes, the APA could.  Nobody holds their pen.  They have done worse (allegedly in the eyes of some, but not in the eyes of the courts) and come out smelling like a rose.   
 
Marty and his merry band routinely rely on "implicit assumptions" in their strategy.  They should just accept the axiom that you might be right but it might cost you less to negotiate...   "The time value of seniority".... 😀   
 
The APA would never do that to get ahead, I would guess.  But "would" and "could" aren't the same thing, and with the APA, history shows there is no telling what they will actually do... and implicit assumptions won't be helpful to anyone, especially AOL.
"And that would be quite humorous"

I don't think the APA is stupid enough to follow the USAPA "example" as you suggest which is more hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Metroyet said:
Claxon is a bi-polar idiot. If there is an agreed upon combined seniority list, it only happens if the West Merger Committee agrees. Period. No one is dictating the seniority list like the Azzhole East pilots attempted to do...and failed. The APA is powerless,  the FBA fake union, LLC non profit Elks Club in NC is utterly powerless, and the West Committee is along for the ride as well. It matters who has the best argument. I don't think the West has any competition in that arena. You know, "powerful evidence of a fair result" and all. :lol:
I think we have gotten a preview of the USAPA LLC SLI presentation.
 
EastCheats said:
"And that would be quite humorous"

I don't think the APA is stupid enough to follow the USAPA "example" as you suggest which is more hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol:
 Its not a suggestion.  Implicitly assuming the limits of the APA conniving,  well...  When one "thinks" about what others will or will not do with their pen, it is a gamble.  
 
Did APA sign a deal with ALPA?  ALPA eventually lost the lawsuit, but both ALPA and APA could afford the lawsuits plenty easy.   
 
What did it cost AOL to go all the way to the SCOTUS?  It was commonly reported as $2Million.   Supposedly USAPA has $15Million.  So perhaps AOL should consider that USAPA can be a defendant for about 7.5 trips to the SCOTUS,  and APA certainly can afford more.   Threats of lawsuits are not that persuasive, especially considering the "time value of litigation", uhhh, I meant "the time value of seniority.  
 
Phoenix said:
Its not a suggestion.  Implicitly assuming the limits of the APA conniving,  well...  When one "thinks" about what others will or will not do with their pen, it is a gamble.  
 
Did APA sign a deal with ALPA?  ALPA eventually lost the lawsuit, but both ALPA and APA could afford the lawsuits plenty easy.   
 
What did it cost AOL to go all the way to the SCOTUS?  It was commonly reported as $2Million.   Supposedly USAPA has $15Million.  So perhaps AOL should consider that USAPA can be a defendant for about 7.5 trips to the SCOTUS,  and APA certainly can afford more.   Threats of lawsuits are not that persuasive, especially considering the "time value of litigation", uhhh, I meant "the time value of seniority.
$15 million seems inflated. Marty can help deflate those expectations, which reads more like a fantasy. AWE 🙁
 
UTurn: Why Wye River Didn't Save Dave?
If the Wright brothers were alive today Wilbur would have to fire Orville to reduce costs. Herb Kelleher, Southwest Airlines, USA Today, 8 June 1994.

Last February at Wye River, Rice and Prater told both MECs that the NIC would never be implemented. The East pilots had the votes to stop it. Thats why ALPA spent so much time and money trying to get us to compromise. The failure of Wye River pretty much ended ALPA on the property and ALPA knew it.

The real victims of Wye River are the 175 West pilots getting furloughed. We can thank our MEC for that. The Pro-ALPA East MEC offered a compromise they thought would save ALPA and get a cram-down contract vote out before the final USAPA election. According to our sources who were there, the East offer had fences that protected their retirement attrition and prevented East pilots from bidding into PHX/LAS and pushing down West pilots down. Furloughs would be based on length of service. We hear that came out of an old Empire Airlines furlough model.

The East MEC offer would have put Dave ODell ahead of approximately 400 east pilots (not a typo four hundred). The East MECs offer was furloughs based on longevity, months of active mainline service.

Thats right, guys. They were desperate to save ALPA and their cushy union jobs. The polling must have told them their plan would save ALPA. For sure their proposal would SAVE DAVE from furlough.

Just like in the B-757 IOU, the E-190 arbitration IOU and unbalanced East-West flying, our MEC ended up getting 175 West pilots furloughed, because they refused to negotiate and THEY TURNED DOWN THE OFFER!

From what weve been told, Jeff Freund left the Wye River conference out of frustration over our MECs refusal to negotiate a compromise. Our MEC says they held the line. If failure to negotiate, causing 175 furloughs, is holding the line, great job, guys. The East MEC made an offer that would have prevented Dave ODell from being furloughed. You turned it down.


So, if you still think our MEC were heroes at Wye River, tell that to our bottom 175 pilots. All we can say is when you update your resume, just remember who didnt SAVE DAVE.


Your compatriots provided tremendous information about Freund and his feelings about the Nicolau list. Freund is on record stating it was merely a bargaining position.
This is known by the APA. When you try to present the Nicolau, you better be prepared to deal with the APA because you cannot argue putting only east furloughed in your staple job. M/B is for keeping you socialists from that. If you staple east furloughed, you have to staple AA furloughed.good luck with trying that on a group of furloughed much larger than your entire pilot list. Hopefully the east and APA will slam a deal that protects them and crashes you hard. FREUND will be in the harsh light.
 
Eastcheats/ Spinthis /Cactuspilot1 being one and the same, all angry 2004 hires rolled the dice and lost. Dave can thank the east for being his safety net.
 
traderjake said:
Claxon, luvthe9, EastUS1 being one and insane........... 
 
You've previously bragged about not even owning a television, so I'll happily take your opinion on anyone's respective sanity as high praise towards them indeed. A small point of curiosity though: you do at least have running water and electricty available within your strange little cocoon....?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top