What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
EastUS1 said:
While ever-busying yourself trumpeting the supposed virtues of your position; might we trouble "you'se" to take a moment to explain even just the log book issue alone? Any at all reasonable attempt to even begin to try and explain the "thought" processes behind that absurdly infantile little antic would prove most amusing....So? I'm sure we're all eagerly awaiting ANY explanation behind the righteous wisdom so maturely demonstrated there, as I'll guess is the FAA.

 
Not my job. I feel that ooking into this is best left in the hands of the FAA/DOT.
Don't you think that the FAA would be the proper authority to "ook" into it? Capt Obvious..
 
CactusPilot1 said:
Don't you think that the FAA would be the proper authority to "ook" into it? Capt Obvious..
 
I do, as posted, and reasonably assume they might actually make some headway even without "fingerprints and DNA,".....but you can certainly hope not, of course.
 
EastUS1 said:
I do, as posted, and reasonably assume they might actually make some headway even without "fingerprints and DNA,".....but you can certainly hope not, of course.
Let us know how the investigation turns out because you obviously need a distraction from arbitration and the fact the West has a seat. Let me know how the talks go at Wye River or if anybody figures out who employs Kevin Horner. You know, the really important stuff. To Claxon and Luv maybe.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
Let us know how the investigation turns out because you obviously need a distraction from arbitration and the fact the West has a seat. Let me know how the talks go at Wye River or if anybody figures out who employs Kevin Horner. You know, the really important stuff. To Claxon and Luv maybe.


It's over and the company knows who it was, can't wait to hear his defense.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
You sound like a good union, correction, company pilot.
You mean kind of like this guy..........





One of the four Leonidas LLC directors is apparently now employed as an American Airlines pilot;\

Having Kevin Horner associated in any way with this DFR only hurts the effort. How can he adequately meet the fiduciary requirements to fairly represent the class? Our sources have told us that Kevin Horners current union, the APA, is furious with him for his participation in a DFR suit against another union.
 
luvthe9 said:
That has been done, Hey which one of you idiots turned down the NIC when we offered it to you, it must really eat at you every single day and night.

What about it boys, must have been CP1.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
It's more fun watching you, poser-loser. You just come here to stir the pot.
 
Don't let them get to you, JJ.   Typical Eastie, they're all the same.   And what's worse, they've got no respect for high culture.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzGEiw_ePUA
 
nycbusdriver said:
I doubt they considered DNA evidence, but since you work closely with those drooling idiot "pyluts" in PHX maybe they should check for DNA evidence.
I would not count on it. If you want DNA evidence, look for a blue dress worn by Monica Lewinsky.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
Representing the pilots of US Airways..In name only, as of last year, that chapter closed.


Your funny son, do remind us all again what the little westies bring to this merge. Could it be.........NOTHING!



That chapter on the NIC by the way..........CLOSED! Fool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top