What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
luvthe9 said:
Huh? Were you or were you not offered the NIC, you turned it down when offered it to you.
You are the one that has wrecked the careers of your own group son, IT dept, sure lets go with that one.
Just be grateful we saved you!
WYE on earth would we negotiate AWA from the product of an mutually agreed upon process? Please tell me that you're going to lead with that in your opening arguments. Then be sure to close with "It's not fair".
 
cactusboy53 said:
WYE on earth would we negotiate AWA from the product of an mutually agreed upon process? Please tell me that you're going to lead with that in your opening arguments. Then be sure to close with "It's not fair".
Good point. And of course the requirements to complete the process were never met. Any contract that could have satisfied the majority would have been too expensive for the company. All in the past now. 
 
cactusboy53 said:
WYE on earth would we negotiate AWA from the product of an mutually agreed upon process? Please tell me that you're going to lead with that in your opening arguments. Then be sure to close with "It's not fair".
Wye?  Wye?  Wye?
 
The fact was that no matter what SLI award resulted from the arbitration process, the award was contractually subject to an additional contingency pursuant to the 2005 TA.  Ratification.  Either side had veto power.  Some say that it was the West that demanded that provision as a backstop to a fair process.  I don't know.  And I don't care.  ALPA provided it and all parties agreed to it.  Integrity, righteousness and apple pie, don't ya know!  
 
Regardless, it was a contractual contingency that indeed provided a backstop.  And it wasn't the only legal backstop, as it turns out. The legal effect was that further negotiations, to reach a fair result, were an inevitability.. if a majority demanded it.  And demand it they did! 
 
Dave, you have been negotiating ever since the award was published.  The award was immediately perceived as a long shot at being ratified... You all knew it.  We all knew it.. and so the campaigning began.  You cried all kinds of rivers to get it ratified.  Some of you stole personal address information to send out ratification propaganda in the form of neat little glossy brochures with all kinds of attempts to persuade... See?  We remember! You started negotiating from the very beginning oh so many years ago. 😀  You all were negotiating of necessity, because you wanted something different than the status quo.. and you had to persuade a majority of the pilots to get something different.  When that didn't work you ran off to the courts thinking you might persuade the courts to accept and mandate your implicit assumptions, and in the meantime it could help whittle away at the majority thingy you were negotiating for.  West pilots ran for USAPA president, and used that pulpit to once again negotiate in public, trying to persuade a majority to choose to move past the next contingency of the 2005 TA.. a ratification.   You sold ties to an easy audience.  All the while you guys crowed that you made more money, that you had better vacation, better medical, etc. etc. etc.... all trying to persuade pilots into voting for a new status quo... It was negotiating.
 
The fact is that you all have been vigorously negotiating all along.  It was the contingency that was inevitable, and you have stepped up to the challenge.   You collected and spent a lot of money in your negotiating campaign.  
 
You have not been willing to compromise.   I don't expect many Westies to admit the distinction.  
 
Negotiations are just about over and we are quickly moving into a new arbitration with a new status quo.  This time it will result in a fair and equitable SLI award, and frankly the results over the next decade will never be as entertaining as the last decade.  
 
Cheers. 🙂
 
P.S.  You guys got a ratification vote and a change to the Status Quo.  And you proved to be quite persuaded for it... far more than any other group!
 
luvthe9 said:
 Were you or were you not offered the NIC, you turned it down when offered it to you.
 
LUVtoLIE   can't help himself  from repeating this whopper.
 
Furlough by DOH/LOS was not the Nicolau award.
 
Why wouldn't the West jump  at the chance to furlough all their F/Os and some of their Captains before the first East pilot hit the street?
 
luvthe9 said:
Huh? Were you or were you not offered the NIC, you turned it down when offered it to you.

You are the one that has wrecked the careers of your own group son, IT dept, sure lets go with that one.


Just be grateful we saved you!
 
 
They were offered the Nic, and the irony is they were the ones that got furloughed anyway. They refused to come to any agreement about a change to the status quo until the MOU came along many years later.  It was their choice.  
 
They made their choice.  We made ours.  Water under the bridge.  The next SLI arbitration will be fair and equitable and we will all live happily ever after, except for the ones that buy into new ties to carry on their own discontent. 😀
 
traderjake said:
Birds of a feather....
Everyone hears ya Dan. You are a groupie and stalker for all USAPphiles but you share no feathers with them. Sleep easy. We all understand and appreciate your feelings. Don't let the bedbugs bite. 🙂 🙂
 
traderjake said:
LUVtoLIE   can't help himself  from repeating this whopper.
 
Furlough by DOH/LOS was not the Nicolau award.
 
Why wouldn't the West jump  at the chance to furlough all their F/Os and some of their Captains before the first East pilot hit the street?
So funny, Traitor calling Dave a liar, geez after all this "whopper" was written by a westie.


Guess you can't handle the truth. Try to keep up!



Taking Responsibility

A recession is when you have to tighten your belt; depression is when you have no belt to tighten. When you've lost your trousers - you're in the airline business. Sir Adam Thomson

Over the past few U-Turns, weve noticed a change in the tone of comments weve received. Maybe the reality of what we are up against is finally sinking in. Some accused us of taking the quotes from the Freund rebuttal out of context. We didnt. Weve had requests for copies of Jeff Freunds actual East Vs West court documents. The file is too big to be directly cut and pasted. We can forward it in a scanned PDF-ZIP/Scan format. Just email us. Remember, we have no website, no budget and receive no donations. Maybe someone will paste it as an attachment on the AWAPPA web board for all to view. We would do it ourselves, but weve all been banned from the AWAPPA web board since May.

We have also received additional comments on what happened at Wye River from both sides. While our initial reporting appears to be correct and consistent with the latest accounts, it was incomplete. Heres additional information from both sides.

According to our reports, on Day One of Wye River, Jeff Freund warned the West MEC that if USAPA won, the West risked losing everything. He urged reaching an agreement. He was gone on Day Two. We wont address his motivation for leaving.
As Jeff Freund observed in his rebuttal to the East MEC lawsuit, the NIC was not in stone. And the loss of ALPA put it in real trouble. At least ALPA had the obligation, through the ALPA Merger Policy, to attempt to get the company to use the NIC Award.

ALPAs lawyers knew the list was negotiable, but they never told either rank and file. We attended last summers ALPA road shows in PHX, starring Paul Rice and a cast of ALPA attorneys. Did ALPA ever hint that the NIC was negotiable? We believe it was for fear of fanning the flames and drawing more support for USAPA that Herndon kept that from us. They did tell all the Wye River attendees the reality. One side listened, the other didnt.

In last summers East Vs West lawsuit, the East used ALPA DUES MONEY and an ALPA-Approved attorney, Roland Wilder, to pursue the case. As far as we can determine, we had to use our own Merger Fund money to defend ourselves. Thanks for choosing sides, ALPA! In the likely event that the NIC will be trashed in a single contract, it will be our own voluntary contributions that will have to be raised for a DFR lawsuit. USAPA expects it, so we shouldnt disappoint them. This could be an extremely costly effort that could drag on for years. U-Turn is not discouraging filing a DFR, and we need closure.

Jeff Freund is a top-notch lawyer. We have no doubt that he told our MEC the truth about how negotiable the NIC really was. The question is: why didnt CJ, Bendett, et al, listen? We figure that they either didnt believe him or after all their hairy-chested resolutions and hotlines, they were afraid to back down. What good are attorneys if you dont take their advice?

There is one other possibility. We mentioned it in a previous U-Turn. Our union leaders believed that the USAPA vote would be close (razors edge, to quote one of them) and that it was worth holding out and rolling the dice, figuring that if ALPA survived, so would the NIC. Too bad ALPA didnt explain the importance of the 30% of East pilots who refused to participate in the Wilson Polling.

We now have a better picture what the East MEC had on the table: an 8 year fence, furloughs by longevity (LOS), MDA time not counting for longevity, Dave ODell having 400 pilots below him, and the Nic surviving as THE LIST. Yes, the East offered the NIC. They just wanted to protect their retirement attrition, which stalled by the change in Age-60. Looking back, that offer must look like a home run to any West pilot right now, but last February the EAST MEC and ALPA couldnt get to first base with it.

Our former MEC and our union leadership played a very high stakes game of poker by not dealing at Wye River. Freund was right, we were risking everything..and right now, it looks like we lost. They need to take responsibility for that.

U-Turn
 
Future forecast for PHX..........NO NIC......AAaaaaaahhhhhhh.


We all have to support our IT department they have quite a bit to do!.
 
luvthe9 said:
So funny, Traitor calling Dave a liar, geez after all this "whopper" was written by a westie.
 
Guess you can't handle the truth.
 
Furlough by LOS was not the Nicolau award.
 
You wouldn't know the truth if it was sitting in a chicken bucket on your lap.  😀
 
traderjake said:
 
Furlough by LOS was not the Nicolau award.
 
You wouldn't know the truth if it was sitting in a chicken bucket on your lap.  😀
Or a large pepperoni pizza.  Dan is right.  Furlough by LOS was NOT in the Nicolau.  Sorry Luvr, WE don NOT negotiate AWAY from the product of an agreed upon process.  Arbitrator Javitz got it.  Judges all over the nation got it, but just couldn't find the hammer to deliver that blow to USAPA. 
 
We're in a new SLI process.  The questions are:
 
  1. What will the Jess look like?
  2. What will APA offer as a beginning and end to SLI?
  3. What will the West Merger Committee propose?
  4. What will the Arbitration Panel deliver (They can deliver ANYTHING they deem FAIR & EQUITABLE)?
 
traderjake said:
Furlough by LOS was not the Nicolau award.
 
You wouldn't know the truth if it was sitting in a chicken bucket on your lap.  😀


Only truth you need to know is .......NO NIC EVER.....run along and buy a tie.
 
cactusboy53 said:
Or a large pepperoni pizza.  Dan is right.  Furlough by LOS was NOT in the Nicolau.  Sorry Luvr, WE don NOT negotiate AWAY from the product of an agreed upon process.  Arbitrator Javitz got it.  Judges all over the nation got it, but just couldn't find the hammer to deliver that blow to USAPA. 
 
We're in a new SLI process.  The questions are:
 

  • What will the Jess look like?
  • What will APA offer as a beginning and end to SLI?
  • What will the West Merger Committee propose?
  • What will the Arbitration Panel deliver (They can deliver ANYTHING they deem FAIR & EQUITABLE)?


You forgot one..........what does the west want to do with the AA furloughed kids, can't wait.



This is going to be fun to watch, and remember be a good Union pilot.
 
According to our reports, on Day One of Wye River, Jeff Freund warned the West MEC that if USAPA won, the West risked losing everything. He urged reaching an agreement. He was gone on Day Two. We won’t address his motivation for leaving.
As Jeff Freund observed in his rebuttal to the East MEC lawsuit, the NIC was not in stone. And the loss of ALPA put it in real trouble. At least ALPA had the obligation, through the ALPA Merger Policy, to attempt to get the company to use the NIC Award.

ALPA’s lawyers knew the list was negotiable, but they never told either rank and file. We attended last summer’s ALPA road shows in PHX, starring Paul Rice and a cast of ALPA attorneys. Did ALPA ever hint that the NIC was negotiable? We believe it was for fear of fanning the flames and drawing more support for USAPA that Herndon kept that from us. They did tell all the Wye River attendees the reality. One side listened, the other didn’t.

Jeff Freund is a top-notch lawyer. We have no doubt that he told our MEC the truth about how negotiable the NIC really was. The question is: why didn’t CJ, Bendett, et al, listen? We figure that they either didn’t believe him or after all their hairy-chested resolutions and hotlines, they were afraid to back down. What good are attorneys if you don’t take their advice?

There is one other possibility. We mentioned it in a previous U-Turn. Our union leaders believed that the USAPA vote would be close (razor’s edge, to quote one of them) and that it was worth holding out and rolling the dice, figuring that if ALPA survived, so would the NIC.
 
Any westie, answer this question who turned the NIC down at Wye River when it was offered up to you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top