What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Claxon said:
Judge Wake was firmly in your pocket courtesy of your Judge Baldock connection.
Another judge would be fine with it as it was entirely relevant.
By the way, the C&R board is not happy with you cutting and pasting to other boards.
 
Let's clear something up, Clax. Claiming Judge Wake is in someone's pocket is far more serious of a charge. How do you know I cut and pasted anything from the C&R boards? There is a www out there with C&R posts. The fact of the matter is when you can't control the message, you get your pink panties in a wad.
 
 
snapthis said:
Let's clear something up, Clax. Claiming Judge Wake is in someone's pocket is far more serious of a charge. How do you know I cut and pasted anything from the C&R boards? There is a www out there with C&R posts. The fact of the matter is when you can't control the message, you get your pink panties in a wad.
"Pink"????

Do elaborate on the occasion of your discovery.
 
Phoenix said:
"Pink"????

Do elaborate on the occasion of your discovery.
 
I discovered that Judge Conrad put them on your head.
 
Injunction.
 
It's poetic justice when those bullies issuing Pink Panty awards get to wear them.
 
US AIRWAYS, INC.,
 
Plaintiff,
 
v.
 
US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION
 
and MICHAEL J. CLEARY
 
 







 
Intimidating Pilots who are not “On Board”
USAPA has intimidated pilots who refuse to go along with the slowdown. For example,
on June 23, 2011, USAPA’s Charlotte Domicile issued an Update asking pilots to report their
colleagues who accept flight assignments from the scheduling department referred to in the East
pilot CBA as POTAs (Priority of Trip Assignments). Pl’s Ex. 1 at ¶ 29: Hemenway Decl; Pl’s
Ex. 13: USAPA Update.

 
Pilots also received numerous anonymous communications designed to intimidate them
into participating in the slowdown. USAPA never did anything to stop the intimidation . For
example, on July 24, 2011, an anonymous text message was sent to East pilots criticizing a US
Airways pilot by name, stating:
Seems like we have our first winner for the COMPANY SUCK UP AWARD... PINK
PANTY AWARD or whatever you want to call it. This A330 CAP on Reserve, on July
15th had 1 Day Available, suddenly on July 16th he is on a . . . 3 day trip.
Congratulations go to ____ ____ as our first winner. Keep up the good work by
screwing all your fellow pilots that are trying to get a contract we deserve. If you have a
good reason please let everyone know.







 
USAPA Update on Injunction Order
In compliance with Section IV of Judge Conrad’s ruling in the United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina, USAPA is distributing the following notice to all US Airways pilots by the most expeditious means possible. USAPA will provide more information as soon as it becomes available. Thank you for your prompt and thorough review of the following:
NOTICE TO ALL US AIRWAYS PILOTS​
In July 2011, US Airways filed a complaint against USAPA alleging USAPA had violated and was violating the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”) by, among other things, engaging in a concerted effort to interfere with US Airways’ airline operations, including but not limited to a slowdown, work stoppage, strike, sick-out, work to rule campaign, and other concerted refusals to perform normal pilot operations. At the time it filed the complaint, US Airways sought a preliminary injunction to prevent USAPA from engaging in the acts and conduct alleged in the complaint. After a full evidentiary hearing conducted on August 19 and 22, 2011, by decision and order dated September 28, 2011, the Court found there was evidence sufficient to meet the legal burden that USAPA had engaged in actions that violated the RLA.
The September 28, 2011 order specifically enjoins USAPA and its members, agents, and employees, and any persons and organizations acting in concert with, through, or under it, or by and through its order, from violating the status quo provisions of the Railway Labor Act and from permitting, instigating, authorizing, encouraging, participating in, approving, or continuing any interference with Plaintiff’s airline operations, including, but not limited to, any slowdown, strike, work stoppage, sick-out, work to rule campaign, or any concerted refusal to perform normal pilot operations in violation of the RLA. This order continues in effect unless and until modified by the Court.
All US Airways pilots are instructed to fully perform their normal working schedules and practices.
All US Airways pilots who are engaging in a concerted refusal to perform normal pilot operations are directed to cease and desist from any concerted refusal to perform normal pilot operations, by engaging in acts including but not limited to slow taxiing, writing up all maintenance items, calling in fatigued, delaying flights, refusing to answer a call from the scheduling, refusing to fly an aircraft that meets the requirements for flight, or refusing to accept voluntary or overtime flying, and to cease and desist all exhortations or communications encouraging same.
USAPA will take all steps and measures to comply with the letter and spirit of the Court’s order and instructs and directs all US Airways pilots to do the same. Any and all acts and conduct in violation of this Order may subject individuals and those acting in concert with them to punishment under the contempt powers of the Court.
A copy of the order issued by the Court is shown below.
US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION
 
snapthis said:
 
I discovered that Judge Conrad put them on your head.
 
...
 
 
 
You seem to have lost your sense of humor and are taking all this far too seriously.  :Lol:
 
Phoenix said:
You seem to have lost your sense of humor and are taking all this far too seriously.  :Lol:
Seriously? In all seriousness, I found a little humor in my email from the APA.

"The resolution states that "it shall be the policy of the APA to pursue a jumpseat reservation system that allows pilots to reserve a jumpseat in seniority order up until 3 days prior to scheduled departure time."

Well, do we go by seniority on the C&R's? At least that puts the E and W pilots on equal footing.
Sen: 0
 
snapthis said:
Seriously? In all seriousness, I found a little humor in my email from the APA.

"The resolution states that "it shall be the policy of the APA to pursue a jumpseat reservation system that allows pilots to reserve a jumpseat in seniority order up until 3 days prior to scheduled departure time."

Well, do we go by seniority on the C&R's? At least that puts the E and W pilots on equal footing.
Sen: 0
 
 
I got a good laugh about the proximity of the noun "APA" and the transitive verb "pursue".  "APA pursue"? .. YGTBFSM.     :lol:
 
APA will be the "IT delay beach" for Parker, and they will like it!  A dozen cream filled donuts at a police headquarters has a better chance of successfully puffing their chests than the APA.  
 
Phoenix said:
I got a good laugh about the proximity of the noun "APA" and the transitive verb "pursue".  "APA pursue"? .. YGTBFSM.     :lol:
 
APA will be the "IT delay beach" for Parker, and they will like it!  A dozen cream filled donuts at a police headquarters has a better chance of successfully puffing their chests than the APA.
I certainly see your humor and this Jumpseat issue is going to provide us with more entertainment. Pass the donuts and popcorn and a belt extender. I predict a major weight gain by the time this is over.
 
snapthis said:
I certainly see your humor and this Jumpseat issue is going to provide us with more entertainment. Pass the donuts and popcorn and a belt extender. I predict a major weight gain by the time this is over.
 
snapthis said:
Seriously? In all seriousness, I found a little humor in my email from the APA.

"The resolution states that "it shall be the policy of the APA to pursue a jumpseat reservation system that allows pilots to reserve a jumpseat in seniority order up until 3 days prior to scheduled departure time."

Well, do we go by seniority on the C&R's? At least that puts the E and W pilots on equal footing.
Sen: 0
What was the america west jump seat policy in 2006?  
 
Rhetorical question so I will help you, NONE!  You west pilots were kicked off for weight and balance reasons, no reservation system 
 
spin this, you provide hypocrisy on this board on a daily basis and I will call you out on this daily.
 
By the way you were complaining and lamenting on the hazards of smoking, when a poster informed you there was a cigar in your avatar hero's hand.  You air brushed it off, almost as good of a job as Ms. Jenner's recent photo shots, but the stogie is coming back in to view lately.       Hypocrite!
 
america west pilots are on the C & R board proclaiming they do not want wide body seats or other bases, BS, circa post USAPA being voted in.
 
Why did the west not ask for a PHX fence? Rhetorical question.
 
N924PS said:
Calling a Senior Federal Judge corrupt on a public forum, even under a pseudonym, meets the standard of a libelous statement.

I would not be surprised if they root you out and serve you. You might want to reconsider your post and delete it before something untoward happens to you.
 
You had best inform his honor of that immediately then....and see if he gives so much as even half a hair off a rat's arse about your "expert" legal opinion, or anything else posted here for that matter, and "before something untoward happens to you"...Seriously? Grow up....It's never too late to at least try to do so.
 
Oh well. You've every right to post here, but should anyone find me doing so once retired from the airline chapter of experience, well, I'd ask the gentle kindness of just simply shooting me, since it would then be demonstrably clear that I've no actual life left to live anyway. 😉
 
EastCheats said:
Is Claxon cranky because it's past his medtime? :lol:
The only meds being delivered tonight are truth enemas for the west pilot merger committee. 
 
Just a suggestion to the arbitration board below.
 
I believe American Pilots will come to an agreement in seniority with USAPA pre arbitration..
 
"THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY UNDER THE MCCASKILL-BOND AMENDMENT IS LIMITED TO INTEGRATING THE PILOT SENIORITY LISTS ON THE BASIS OF THE STATUS QUO OF THREE SEPARATE SENIORITY LISTS IN EFFECT ON DECEMBER 9, 2013
 
The USAPA Merger Committee anticipates that the APA West Pilot Committee may assert that the pilots of US Airways should be integrated together on the basis of the arbitration award issued by Arbitrator George Nicolau in the ALPA Merger Policy proceeding initiated by the merger of US Airways and America West. This Arbitration Board has no authority to integrate the pilots of US Airways and American on any basis other than the three separate seniority lists in effect on December 9, 2013."
 
snapthis said:
 
Let's clear something up, Clax. Claiming Judge Wake is in someone's pocket is far more serious of a charge....
 
 
Well then; I suppose I'll have to just go with him being a fully demonstrated and obvious fool instead. Feel better now? Honestly; what sort of truly astute judge EVER addreses imaginary "damages"  before a verdict's even rendered, just for starters? One can certainly understand though, why he, perhaps second to only "St. Nic" himself, remains the patron saint of the west, but did it never once even bother you at all about just how incredibly short a time it took for the 9th circuit to both wish to hear the case, as well as to drop kick his nonsensical BS out of their court and essentially send him back to "you've flat-out gotta' be kidding us"/remedial jurisprudence 101?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top