What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
MUTATIS MUTANDIS said:
well he was the 9th circuit said that trial should have never take place so in fact he decision to conduct such a venture was ruled against. Keep up!
The trial should have never take place. That's intelligent. :lol:

Of course the trial should have not taken (notice there is a n)...place. Judge Wake was not on trial.
 
EastCheats said:
Judge Wake was questioned and ruled against.... hmmm.
 
USAPA v Judge Wake. Can't seem to find that appeal.
 
THAT's BECAUSE
 
Judge Wake was not on trial.
 
 
 
What an idiot. A common trait with those Usapians.
 
 
"So you are the new Nicolau?"
 
The Westicles implicitly assume that the Prelim Arb Board made the assertion that there will not be a new Nicolau (a new arbitrator).   Didn't say that.  Quite the opposite...  The PAB's rhetorical question implicitly acknowledged there is of necessity a new arbitrator..."the new Nicolau"..   The PAB objected to a USAPA Committee member assuming they themselves will fill the role of "the new Nicolau". 
 
By giving the Westicles their own SLI Committee the judge clearly magnified the fact that there is of necessity a new Nicolau, to whom representatives of the three lists must be allowed to make their case. 
 
The PAB's closing statement.. "Its a new day".. shows exactly that.  Its a new day, and everyone gets to argue their new arguments, from a new status quo, to a new Nicolau.    
 
Good luck telling "the new Nicolau" that they are the old Nicolau.  
 
CactusPilot1 said:
What an idiot. A common trait with those Usapians.
Wake made a fool of himself and got his trial remanded. Even Bobby Baldock the EAL scab could not pull a deal with his daddy.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
What an idiot. A common trait with those Usapians.
To bad about your NIC, WYE RIVER, really just get over it.



I'm fine with the APA proposal, how bout you boy.





Really ashame how AOL ruined the careers of the west pilots.
 
MUTATIS MUTANDIS said:
hilarious ! Judge Wake was also questioned and ruled against by the 9th circuit court of appeals , Good thing the 9th did not buy his golf lessons , or seen his courtroom since!
 
An insightful post from March 2015 pried back the lid on Judge Baldock's corrupt little fiefdom:
 
 
2015 Pilot Discussion.

av-9929.jpg
Posted by dariencc on 31 March 2015 - 09:07 PM in American Airlines

I can't say I'm surprised by this latest development.  The respected Lawless America blog has made serious corruption allegations against the "Honorable" Judge Bobby Baldock.  Hey, a guy's got to pay for the country club membership somehow, right?
 
I will not try to convict a man without due process, though the allegations do appear to be credible.  Stand by for the Phoenix peanut gallery to attempt to prematurely exonerate the judge.
 
http://www.lawlessam...1907&Itemid=100
 
I just can't help but wonder if the "Honorable" justice put in a good word for Johnny Jurkoff during his bitter divorce and personal bankruptcy?
 
Arizona justice.
 
Claxon said:
Wake made a fool of himself and got his trial remanded. Even Bobby Baldock the EAL scab could not pull a deal with his daddy.
 
Yes, there it is on the official master scab list:

 

 



Baker, Robert L     EAL 89       03487
Balbin, Sergia        EAL 89
       71545, 5/89





Baldock, Bob       EAL 89      America West Scab Supply   



Baldoni, Luis A      EAL 89       01285
Baldridge, J H       EAL 89        03633
 
Corrupt father.  Corrupt son.  The apple didn't fall far from the tree.
 
Yes, there it is on the official master scab list:

 

 Y



Baker, Robert L     EAL 89       03487
Balbin, Sergia        EAL 89
       71545, 5/89










Baldock, Bob       EAL 89      America West Scab Supply   



Baldoni, Luis A      EAL 89       01285
Baldridge, J H       EAL 89        03633
 
Corrupt father.  Corrupt son.  The apple didn't fall far from the tree.
Yes, there it is on the official master scab list:

Geez Strat, I gave you a lot more credit for being a smarter guy.

Calling a Senior Federal Judge corrupt on a public forum, even under a pseudonym, meets the standard of a libelous statement.

I would not be surprised if they root you out and serve you. You might want to reconsider your post and delete it before something untoward happens to you.
 
The message board lawyers have been roused from a deep slumber.  But frankly its too hot right now to play golf.  Maybe later.  
 
Yes, there it is on the official master scab list:

Geez Strat, I gave you a lot more credit for being a smarter guy.

Calling a Senior Federal Judge corrupt on a public forum, even under a pseudonym, meets the standard of a libelous statement.

I would not be surprised if they root you out and serve you. You might want to reconsider your post and delete it before something untoward happens to you.





Seriously, get a life, still can't let go, your finished.
 
"The United States Department of Justice is using federal grand jury subpoenas to identify anonymous commenters engaged in typical internet bluster and hyperbole in connection with the Silk Road prosecution. DOJ is targeting Reason.com, a leading libertarian website whose clever writing is eclipsed only by the blowhard stupidity of its commenting peanut gallery.
Why is the government using its vast power to identify these obnoxious asshats, and not the other tens of thousands who plague the internet?
 
Because these twerps mouthed off about a judge."
 
http://popehat.com/2015/06/08/department-of-justice-uses-grand-jury-subpoena-to-identify-anonymous-commenters-on-a-silk-road-post-at-reason-com/
 
LUVtoLIE
 
I noticed all sides rejected your DOH with some "nice Conditions and Restrictions".
 
No wonder you're in a bad mood.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top