2015 Pilot Discussion.

[EastCheats]

Speaking of desperation? 
 
Your thoughts please on footnote 12 from the 9th and footnote 4 from the arbs?
 
What you will do is wait for hours and hit and run with dicta and no remedy facts. 
 
Where did you learn that habit from?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rNxz2hhSXuY"]


Work, work, work, footnote 12 work, work, work, footnote 4 repeat. 😉

 

[luvthe9]

En Banc away!!! Roland's on it,

 

[WNMECH]

If you read this clown's posts on SWA, no one wants to talk for him. He appears to be a stooge for SW management. He is management shill. He loves to lurk here. He understands nothing about seniority, or equipment seat position, or union SLI policy or integrity for that matter. He just sits at his keyboard and waits for acceptance, which he craves. 

.

Now that is funny.

You spend your time reading my posts and stalking me on other threads because my post threatens your little USAPA fantasy world view.

Any West pilot must be continually insulted or taunted.
Anyone else who sees you as you are and that USAPA is a disgrace, must be silenced.

George Nicolau understood all the seniority issues and rendered his decision.
Stomp your feet and hold your breath child.
It's really about all you have left.

 

[Metroyet]

En Banc away!!! Roland's on it,

Hasn't Roland been "on it" this whole disasterous time? Who's paying him btw? Did USAPA lie to Conrad or are the 14 named defendants going to add this to the 3.5 million dollars they're on the hook for?

 

[snapthis]

En Banc away!!! Roland's on it,

Here's your reality check. Good luck...,


Grounds for Rehearing

Although petitions for rehearing are filed in a great many cases, few are granted. Filing a petition solely for purposes of delay or in order merely to reargue the case is an abuse of the privilege. A petition for rehearing must contain an introduction stating that, in counsel's judgment, one or more of the following situations exist:

1.
a material factual or legal matter was overlooked in the decision;
2.
a change in the law occurred after the case was submitted and was overlooked by the panel;
3.
the opinion is in conflict with a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, this court, or another court of appeals and the conflict is not addressed in the opinion; or
4.
the proceeding involves one or more questions of exceptional importance.

The petition must state with particularity the points of law or fact that the petitioner believes the court has overlooked or misapprehended and must argue in support of the petition. Fed. R. App. P. 40; Loc. R. 40(a) & (b

Grounds for Hearing or Rehearing En Banc

Hearings and rehearings en banc are not favored and ordinarily will not be ordered unless: en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court's decisions; or the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance. Fed. R. App. P. 35(a).

 

[luvthe9]

Here's your reality check. Good luck...,
Grounds for Rehearing
Although petitions for rehearing are filed in a great many cases, few are granted. Filing a petition solely for purposes of delay or in order merely to reargue the case is an abuse of the privilege. A petition for rehearing must contain an introduction stating that, in counsel's judgment, one or more of the following situations exist:
1.
a material factual or legal matter was overlooked in the decision;
2.
a change in the law occurred after the case was submitted and was overlooked by the panel;
3.
the opinion is in conflict with a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, this court, or another court of appeals and the conflict is not addressed in the opinion; or
4.
the proceeding involves one or more questions of exceptional importance.
The petition must state with particularity the points of law or fact that the petitioner believes the court has overlooked or misapprehended and must argue in support of the petition. Fed. R. App. P. 40; Loc. R. 40(a) & (b
Grounds for Hearing or Rehearing En Banc
Hearings and rehearings en banc are not favored and ordinarily will not be ordered unless: en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court's decisions; or the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance. Fed. R. App. P. 35(a).

And please do tell us all which of the 4 if any were not met, son.






No NIC for you, better get that through head.

 

[cactusboy53]

And please do tell us all which of the 4 if any were not met, son.
No NIC for you, better get that through head.

Uhm....all 4. Duh. No DOH for you'se. Get that Dream Team assembled buddy, times a wasten'!

 

[Metroyet]

Uhm....all 4. Duh. No DOH for you'se. Get that Dream Team assembled buddy, times a wasten'!

"Exceptional Importance" is my favorite. Even Tashmia said to Symanski that the East was the only ones who cared about the use of the Nic.

 

[luvthe9]

Uhm....all 4. Duh. No DOH for you'se. Get that Dream Team assembled buddy, times a wasten'!

Big smiles Dave!

 

[Claxon]

"Exceptional Importance" is my favorite. Even Tashmia said to Symanski that the East was the only ones who cared about the use of the Nic.

Absolutely correct. The Legacy American pilots have absolutely no issue with over a thousand west pilots, younger pilots, bringing no wide body positions to the table- going on top of them.

 

[Metroyet]

Absolutely correct. The Legacy American pilots have absolutely no issue with over a thousand west pilots, younger pilots, bringing no wide body positions to the table- going on top of them.

Nobody cares.

 

[Claxon]

Nobody cares.

Correct again. Why would they care about losing money, vacation, and better schedules?

 

[cactusboy53]

Correct again. Why would they care about losing money, vacation, and better schedules?

We already have a contract, Maroon. What on earth are talking about?

2nd biggest USAPA tool, aren't you?

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Now that is funny.
You spend your time reading my posts and stalking me on other threads because my post threatens your little USAPA fantasy world view.
Any West pilot must be continually insulted or taunted.
Anyone else who sees you as you are and that USAPA is a disgrace, must be silenced.
George Nicolau understood all the seniority issues and rendered his decision.
Stomp your feet and hold your breath child.
It's really about all you have left.

Well I understand it also as a holder of an A/ P retiring as a pilot next year what is your base I, would luv to jump my seniority an supplement my retirement with a job at your base!

 

[luvthe9]

We already have a contract,

And it will never include the NIC Dave thanks to you and good ole WYE RIVER.




Big smiles Dave!