What's new

2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
cactusboy53 said:
No dumba$$. I read the update, and have not had a chance to look over the information.  GOTCHA!  I didn't write any portion of this update, BUT knowing the authors well, I would be VERY SURPRISED to find that it was simply manufactured.
 
READY, FIRE!, AIM....
The LAA guys love it when it makes their job easier in the SLI.
Was there any room for a widebody position in that so precisely described FISHBOWL???
 
cactusboy53 said:
Desperate? No.  I put the computer away for a few days and only had the phone available, thus my saved quoted material was not available. 
 
I'm a bit more energized now, and will continue my search for factual documents to try and instruct "you'se" on what your obligation and duty are.  I hope against hope that you will see the error of your ways, acquiesce to what you are bound to, and of course ask for forgivness for the persecusion that you have flooded us with in an attempt to break our spirit.
 
Have a glorious and blessed day, gentlemen.
I took your advice and went to confession, but my priest busted out laughing and then took me out to lunch for a glass of champagne.
 
P.S. He said that Wake, Silver, and Buyme owe him a visit.. and they better hurry.
 
Phoenix said:
You seem a bit agitated...
Why are you quoting something from the Addington 1 trial? That trial has no relevance now.
The new 9th (the one that is relevant, that even a caveman would know is the one I referred to) specially declined to make the Nic final and binding on anyone at all.
No need to apologize to recover your credibility. It was shot long ago.
Not agitated Scotty. You had NO business "offering" that wasn't yours to give. I do tire of Liar's continuing campaign to lie, obscure & obfuscate what factually happened.

In fact an unmolested Nicolau Seniority List was NEVER offered. The unmolested Nicolau List is the ONLY list EVER accepted by the company. Any other "version" of what you claim is the Nicolau Seniority List was not yours to offer (I don't actually belief what you claim any way, & I would challenge you to prove it.).

As for thw lack of relevance of the trial, I'll let Judge's Conrad & Silver speak to that.

Keep smilin' Scotty.
 
cactusboy53 said:
Not agitated Scotty. You had NO business "offering" that wasn't yours to give. I do tire of Liar's continuing campaign to lie, obscure & obfuscate what factually happened.
In fact an unmolested Nicolau Seniority List was NEVER offered. The unmolested Nicolau List is the ONLY list EVER accepted by the company. Any other "version" of what you claim is the Nicolau Seniority List was not yours to offer (I don't actually belief what you claim any way, & I would challenge you to prove it.).
As for thw lack of relevance of the trial, I'll let Judge's Conrad & Silver speak to that.
Keep smilin' Scotty.
You don't know half the ignorance you possess. I never offered anyone anything regarding the Nic (and I never claimed I did.. But you want me to prove something I never even claimed... calm down a little and contemplate your own advice... Ready, fire, aim.).

I say you seem agitated and you go full apoplectic.

You are off balance. The West suffers because of your assumptive based exuberance.
 
cactusboy53 said:
No dumba$$. I read the update, and have not had a chance to look over the information.  GOTCHA!  I didn't write any portion of this update, BUT knowing the authors well, I would be VERY SURPRISED to find that it was simply manufactured.
 
READY, FIRE!, AIM....
Oooh, did I hit a nerve? I think that first sentence is against the rules there cb. You want to play by the rules, don't you? Oh wait, silly me. Just the rules you like.
 
Dave, would you let us know either way how the en banc goes? Not that it matters if it is denied.
Relax, and go hang with your scratch golfing pal. It will do us all good.
 
Pi brat said:
Oooh, did I hit a nerve? I think that first sentence is against the rules there cb. You want to play by the rules, don't you? Oh wait, silly me. Just the rules you like.
Uh oh, Mr. Goldfish... The Oscar Fish is in your fishbowl.
 
Dave is not himself today, must be in the final DESPERATION mode. Play golf Dave.
 
sad-how-some-people-believe-their-own-lies-and-the-stories-they-make-up-in-their-heads-quote-1.jpg
 
Maybe the West guys will give you a trophy or something when all this is done for championing their cause...
 
cactusboy53 said:
 
Funny.  At the PHX union (you know, a REAL union) meeting, the company guest espoused how very pleased he was with Phoenix's preformance and professionalism.  ...
 
It's funny that you keep referring to Parker & Kirby at crew news events.  Largely, we have stopped attending those for a miriad of reasons.
 
Keep smiling.  It will make the pain that much more bearable.
 
1) So, let me get this straight: The "Company" guest was ever-so-delighted with your "REAL union meeting"...and yet "you'se" don't see the obvious issues with that?  Might one presume that all of your staunch unionists present were wearing their finest formal knee-pads? 😉 "the company guest espoused how very pleased he was with Phoenix's preformance and professionalism..." Did "the company guest" hand out lollipops for you all?...Or even some nice doggie treats at least?...Maybe a patronizing pat on the head and perhaps even had your ears rubbed a bit? Especially given the latest "key update" of yours, infantiley whining about how management's forever lost your precious "trust": WHY in heck are you still so eager to suck up to them?
 
2) I find it less than astonishing that "Largely, we have stopped attending those for a miriad of reasons." It must be reasonably supposed that some of you finally tired of making completely laughable fools of yourselves as so easilly did Mr. "Leeteegashun"...and that's properly myriad, not "miriad".
 
3) What supposed "pain" do you refer to?
 
cactusboy53 said:
 
Sorry.  A bit busy the last several days.  If it's there, we WILL find it.  If it's not, we will take it at face value and follow the contract to a T.  ....
 
What do you mean "If it is there"? The authors of that latest whining idiocy of an "update" did little more than sob themselves silly over such. Either "it is there" or they're nothing more than hysterical, gibbering idiots who've no clue of what they babble on about. Which case are you now advancing as the truth?
 
"If it's not, we will take it at face value and follow the contract to a T." Hmm...Sounds suspiciously like the threat of an "illegal job action" to me. Best be careful out there, lest you all have to "turn in" each other, and let's not forget the obvious joy you've just posted about how "the company guest espoused how very pleased he was with Phoenix's preformance and professionalism..." 😉 Sigh...You really just can't figure out which end is up, can you son?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top