2015 Pilot Discussion.

[Claxon]

Here's the sad thing, Bean.  If any one of us chose to take up Capt. Crunch's little challenge, and managed to beat him fair and square (after he gave his word that he would abide by the results).....he would then likely stomp off with his silk scarf & leather cap and demand a do-over because the results were unfair.
 
This is the kind of response that we have witnessed for the last 8 years.  We would not sooner enter into another agreement with a USAPAian again for that very reason.  We don't play with cheats & liars.[/quote

 

[EastCheats]

Here's the sad thing, Bean.  If any one of us chose to take up Capt. Crunch's little challenge, and managed to beat him fair and square (after he gave his word that he would abide by the results).....he would then likely stomp off with his silk scarf & leather cap and demand a do-over because the results were unfair.
 
This is the kind of response that we have witnessed for the last 8 years.  We would not sooner enter into another agreement with a USAPAian again for that very reason.  We don't play with cheats & liars.[/quote

 
You seem to be "quote" challenged today. 

 

[CactusPilot1]

So, the 9th en banc was denied.  
 
Remand to Silver coming, and according to Conrad's order enjoining the scab union, there will be exactly zero $ available to even send a lawyer to Silver's courtroom.
 
I think they failed to mention that in their latest scab union update.

They failed to mention the most important part.

It's game over, done.

 

[Claxon]

"USAPA UPDATE
 
Today, United States District Judge Conrad issued a preliminary injunction in the consolidated Bollmeier / DJ Action matter pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division. Judge Conrad’s order grants, in part, the Bollmeier plaintiffs’ request that USAPA be enjoined from certain activities. At the hearing on June 30th the Judge instructed the parties to meet and confer to determine proposed temporary restraints upon which they could agree. In light of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling USAPA agreed that it would not spend any more money on merger or seniority related matters and that it would not dissolve without prior written notice to the Plaintiffs and approval by the court. The Bollmeier Plaintiffs sought a much broader set of temporary and preliminary restraints, however, including requests for the Court to enjoin USAPA from expending any funds for any reason, enjoining it from sharing any merger committee “work product”, and an “independent” accounting for all funds expended. Judge Conrad declined the Bollmeier Plaintiffs’ request for very broad restraints, specifically noting that the injunction he issued “would not make it impossible for USAPA to continue to operate” (Doc. 75, at 11).
 
While we are, of course, disappointed that the Court did not dismiss the case at this juncture, we are gratified that it did not grant Plaintiffs the sweeping injunctive relief that they sought. Rather, the Court granted the injunction along the lines of the restraint USAPA had indicated it viewed as consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and USAPA’s withdrawal from the McCaskill-Bond seniority list integration process."
 
USAPA Communications

 

[Claxon]

They failed to mention the most important part.

It's game over, done.

Provide facts for your assertion of game over sir.

 

[CactusPilot1]

Provide facts for your assertion of game over sir.

 
USAPA was just granted the right not to spend money. In your short world that's a win?
 

 

[Ames]

From the beginning USAPA sought a fair and equitable resolution.  Some of the leaders were more vocal about it than others.  Never the less, you belie your hope that it won't be fair and equitable, but rather a retribution.  That might not play out too well.  We'll see.  Sooner or later.  Eventually.

Delusional.

 

[Metroyet]

They failed to mention the most important part.
It's game over, done.

They can form their own Leonidas, get class certification, and continue the fight on their own. Of course they'll have a budget of about $350.00 donated dollars to work with but that's their problem.

 

[CactusPilot1]

They can form their own Leonidas, get class certification, and continue the fight on their own. Of course they'll have a budget of about $350.00 donated dollars to work with but that's their problem.

 
That should buy Luv a bucket of chicken and Eastus a few beers.
 

 

[Ames]

Provide facts for your assertion of game over sir.

The facts are in Judge Conrad's decision today. Find it yourself, it's public info.

 

[Claxon]

 
USAPA was just granted the right not to spend money. In your short world that's a win?
 

USAPA will maybe have to pay appellate attorney fees only.  That comes out of your USAPA refund check, thank you.
 
The East Merger Committee, E(=)MC, will be provided 1.4 million from the company.
Your thoughts please sir?

 

[Claxon]

The facts are in Judge Conrad's decision today. Find it yourself, it's public info.

Oh really?  (sarcasm)  I glossed over it. (sarcasm)

 

[CactusPilot1]

USAPA will maybe have to pay appellate attorney fees only.  That comes out of your USAPA refund check, thank you.
 
The East Merger Committee, E(=)MC, will be provided 1.4 million from the company.
Your thoughts please sir?

 
Ames sums it up (Einstein), sir.
 
In addition, don't miscalculate because anything in the red will come out of personal assets of the defendants.
 

 

[Metroyet]

USAPA will maybe have to pay appellate attorney fees only.  That comes out of your USAPA refund check, thank you.
 
The East Merger Committee, E(=)MC, will be provided 1.4 million from the company.
Your thoughts please sir?

well, that 1.4 million will be paid back by the 12 idiots that misappropriated UNION DUES to pay for East Only SLI issues in lieu of using the APA money first. You don't get to spend that money twice. Hope Hummer has his nitro pills nearby.

 

[Claxon]

 
Ames sums it up (Einstein), sir.
 
In addition, don't miscalculate because anything in the red will come out of personal assets of the defendants.
 

I do not recall reading that in my gloss over, can you provide Judge Conrad quote on your assertion sir?  I can save you time, you will not be able to sir.