Ames said:Where is eastus1? On another bender/breakdown? This news will surely put him on suicide watch should he choose to do more than gloss over the facts.

Why do you call an 85 or 86 hire a third lister?cactusboy53 said:Look Johnny Boy, EVERYONE here knows you are a LIAR, a malcontent, and a duly noted ENTITLED East Pilot. You have cheated and lied your way through this FAKE UNION and it's attempt to evade a FINAL & BINDING SENIORITY integration. Game is almost over.
The bottom line: The Ninth said that "USAPA has breached its duty of fair representation". Further, they said: "..constitutionally committed to a date-of-hire list that favored the East Pilots, USAPA could never fairly and impartially represent the West pilots."
Finally they said: "We thus remand this case with instructions to the district court to enter an order enjoining USAPA from participating in the McCaskill-Bond seniority integration proceedings, including any seniority-related discussions leading up to those proceedings, except to the extent that USAPA advocates the Nicolau Award."
Now let's see if Judge Silver's "meaningless dicta" will now bite you in the backside.
USAPA is now on the hook for court expenses and perhaps damages.
BTW, had a very nice conversation with a third-lister. He shared your bragged-ID, and how proud you were of your bully-tactics. Name and posts noted for future use (as needed), John. Have a great day & smile big.
Reading comprehension troubles? I said the 3rd lister was Johnny Boy's FO. These legal setbacks are really getting to you, huh Clax?Claxon said:Why do you call an 85 or 86 hire a third lister?
I know exactly what you said. You talked to someone who was not a third lister, but an85 -86 hire.cactusboy53 said:Reading comprehension troubles? I said the 3rd lister was Johnny Boy's FO. These legal setbacks are really getting to you, huh Clax?
Relax. We'll be out to help you soon.
Ahhh, I love the smell of DESPERATION in the morning. Good morning, Claxy Boy.Claxon said:Cactusboy53 is telling lies again. Your " third lister " can't keep a secret.
Bean said:.......That you'se thing really kills me East. I'm know, by intention. But seriously, can we agree it's ridiculous and sure sounds like a great way to negatively characterize an entire pilot group, but also understand that it clearly displayed that pilot's true frustration and disbelief that he had to stand up and confront a group so inclined to destroy him and his peers careers. I get it, as we all do, that it makes us look like what you want to believe true, but come on.
Thinking about it though, it would be fun to go aerial against another, and I can't believe I didn't realize that was the challenge from the get go. Just wish it was a hobby of mine that I could excel at and then challenge others to. Never too late I guess.
cactusboy53 said:EastUS1 & Johnny Boy lurking. Good morning boys!
EastUS1 said:
1) "a group so inclined to destroy him"...Seriously? That pitifully drooling little "I hate all of you'se" infantile moron was just whining about how he "was going to be a captain", but apparently hadn't so much as even mastered much of the english language beforehand. I was almost expecting to see his presumably-overly-protective mommy show up to give him a comforting hug and wipe the frothy drool from his chin afterwards. Seriously; "destroy him"? Where does all the drama queen nonsense come from?
2) "Thinking about it though, it would be fun to go aerial against another," On a personal level; I'd think you an enjoyable individual to meet and talk with, but while you're working any attempted "defense" of your juvenile group: Suggested minimum wager's $5K. Once all this mess is finally finished I'd be fine to fly it purely for fun. Is the nature of the wager "fair" on my part?...Arguably not, but I'm not trying to support the side that's bragged about what AWAsome "pilots" they supposedly are for 8 years now. To me a "Pilot" is a creature suited to swim in the sky at any depth.
No offense meant, but you honestly can't be at all serious with my wanting to make anyone "look" as anything other than they've so earnestly proved to the world themselves. Try explaining how such as the following was ever "intelligently" intended to demonstrate anything else to the world than childish narcissism and purely infantile idiocy?
EastCheats said:
After many failed attempts to get someone to take him up on his silly challenges...
As opposed to a less than honest question? 😉EastUS1 said:
An honest question here:
EastCheats said:As opposed to a less than honest question? 😉