snapthis said:Dear Arbitrators Eischen, Jaffe, and Vaughn,
....
The second proffered reason for delaying the scheduled hearings is that the East pilots surmise that the West pilots may seek to have the East Pilots counsel, Mr. Wilder, bound by the injunction in Addington a consequence which apparently is equal in their minds with being disqualif[ied] from representation of the East pilots. I.....
Sincerely,
/s/Jeffrey Freund
[SIZE=12pt]FROM THE WILDER LETTER: [/SIZE]
[SIZE=12pt]Additional disruption to the SLI process may arise from litigation initiated by West pilots represented by Mr. Harper and Mr. Freund under Section 501 of the Labor- Management Reporting and Disclosure Act against certain officers and former officers of USAPA in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina [/SIZE]in [SIZE=12pt]Bollmeier[/SIZE] v. Hummel et al., [SIZE=12pt]Case No. 14-577-RJC (WDNC). [/SIZE]A temporary restraining order was entered against USAPA yesterday in that litigation enjoining USAPA and its officers, agents or employees from any type of expenditure directly or indirectly related to the seniority list integration process. ..... Presumably, the intent of this request was to disqualify my firm from representation of the East Pilot SIC.
cactusboy53 said:You crack me up. Keep that sense of humor, Junior. You're gonna need it.
Phoenix said:.....since so few LAA pilots bought a Liberty Tie!
EastCheats said:
A swarm 😉
How long before the courts serve the parties responsible with responsibility? NOT VERY LONG.Claxon said:west pilots, how many years since the merger was announced? 10
west pilots, how many years, YEARS, since the Nicolau came out. Almost 9.
west pilots, how many jobs and upgrades have you squandered, yes SQUANDERED whilst you follow so called attorneys such as Koontz and Vasin? Hundreds and hundreds.
Another delay coming. The Fishbowl is a very angry and squalid hovel.
FOUR posts in a row. Not desperate at all, Scotty. If you are going to post 4-8X in a row, you should really post FACTUAL information provided by court testimony. Then you will be seen as a scholar, rather than a DESPERATE icehole seeking ENTITLEMENT (IMHO- of course).Phoenix said:
Freund misrepresented/misunderstood the Wilder letter second issue. He didn't even answer the issue since he misunderstood which court issue was being discussed.
I guess that might happen if you have multiple court cases in multiple venues and if you have pilot wannabe lawyers writing briefings for a high powered lawyer.... trying to save money? 😀
cactusboy53 said:.....
Fishbowl is just fine. Line holding FO....
Are you guys willing to admit that you followed the Pied Piper down the road to the SAME outcome and it only cost you MILLIONS of DOLLARS and time off that you will NEVER RECOVER?Phoenix said:Are you guys going to admit who wrote your "second" issue response to the Wilder letter, or are you going to pin the mistake/oversight on Freund?
I challenge you to ....oh wait. I don't play/compete with cheats.EastUS1 said:
OK. I think we're done here. Enjoy.
cactusboy53 said:Are you guys willing to admit that you followed the Pied Piper down the road to the SAME outcome and it only cost you MILLIONS of DOLLARS and time off that you will NEVER RECOVER?
Phoenix said:
Promises. Promises. (P.S. I feel bad for Scotty. He is missing out on some real humor. You should mail him a carbon copy.)
If you are lucky the judges you are pleading to will stay in their box and shake their pompoms from the free speech zone. The Arbs have ruled twice about three committees, now have to rule again in mid September about your East Committee funding dispute, and frankly would probably rather quit having to address your attempted impositions on their authority. Its their job, but there may be a limit to their humor.
Likewise, Claxy. Just like FINAL & BINDING ARBITRATION.Claxon said:I agree Judge Silver did not soften her sentiments or her injunctive judgments.
Enjoy the dicta, but you must honor the judgments.