nostradamus
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2004
- Messages
- 2,038
- Reaction score
- 0
Your point please on this one.
Hey Nos what does "liquidation" mean in usapia? it must be something good, kind of like mda losing the lawsuit and declaring victory. Oh why would phl and clt close?You are wrong, stand by for facts.
Specific evidence of this sir.The point is that this has been covered completely and to death.
Read the whole thread.
The preponderance of the evidence indicates that AWA kept AAA out of chapter seven.
Hey Nos what does "liquidation" mean in usapia? it must be something good, kind of like mda losing the lawsuit and declaring victory. Oh why would phl and clt close?
The AWA contribution is incredibly simple.
You will notice that the Seabury report is entitled; "US Airways reorganization and merger with America West Airlines."
Without America West's interest the Seabury report would not have been commissioned. The timeline indicates that negotiations started even before LOA93 was in place. The only reason any of the funds listed in this report are there is because AWA was a willing participant in a merger.
What exactly did awa bring, was it money or your drunk ceo, one sentence please for your answer.
AWA brought everything.
No AWA, no financing, no AAA.
Please note the date of the report. It is 27 Sept. 05.
The "standalone" plan is simply listed in the timeline during late 2004.
No one was willing to write a check for the "stand-alone" plan.
All the money in the timeline appears after AWA shows up at the party.
awa showed up to the party and they brought exactly what?
Geez you and East must have both gone to avoid answering the question school.Your point sir. You have opinions as we all have body parts, and they all have aroma.
The facts of the Seabury report do not show this is true. First came the money, then came parker with a proven track record of alcohol problems to manage it. Then the money went down the drain.First came Parker then came the money.
No Parker, no money, no AAA.
The facts of the Seabury report do not show this is true. First came the money, then came parker with a proven track record of alcohol problems to manage it. Then the money went down the drain.
The facts show they bet on an airline that gouged the 911 sentiment of this country. The airline had drunk pilots, pilots that flew drugs for money, pilots that spotted space ships in the sky, greed clouds judgment. This will be studied for many years as the classic case of entrepreneurship gone wild.
The facts of the Seabury report do not show this is true. First came the money, then came parker with a proven track record of alcohol problems to manage it. Then the money went down the drain.
The facts show they bet on an airline that gouged the 911 sentiment of this country. The airline had drunk pilots, pilots that flew drugs for money, pilots that spotted space ships in the sky, greed clouds judgment. This will be studied for many years as the classic case of entrepreneurship gone wild.