ClueByFour
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 3,566
- Reaction score
- 37
IM TELLING YOU THAT NO THEY DID NOT THREATEN TO PULL THE HUB.
IT WAS TOM FORESTERS' PET PROJECT.
YOU ARE W-R-O-N-G
Move on.......Just saw ya commuting to phl......really moved on from that overpriced apt on mt washington......gee whats moms friend at United telling yunz now the PIT hub is back????? lol
You are wrong on fact. It was only Tom's project because he did not want to be the one to preside over the loss of that many jobs.
US threatened to pull the hub. It was in the papers. I work for the folks who allow the lights to go on (among other things) in the existing terminal, and I say definitively that it was a similar brand of crap to the bankruptcy act of yanking the hub.
I've said this before and I'll say it again: US needs western Pennsylvania a whole hell of a lot more than WestPA needs US. And what's funny about all of this is that the only way Doug Parker and friends are going to get help in PHL is "cash and carry."
In fact, it's the only way they'll get any airport help anywhere but CLT. And even that is going to come to a head when (not if) SWA goes to enter the CLT market.
As an aside, if US does continue to downsize PIT to the point where they only have real metal to the hubs and RJs everywhere else, they'll lose the remaining stranglehold on that traffic--given a choice between LCC and anyone else, the VFF will go with anyone else. The U product has fallen to the point where it's no longer worth connecting for (much less connecting in an RJ).
And the best part is that if US should collapse again (and make no mistake, if it does the lights go out), PIT will already be positioned to move forward. CLT and PHL (and to a lesser extent, PHX) will take one in the chops.