It's a long list.
Pick any article from a CBA you want. Whatever language you pick, DL workers don't have it...
you mean you don't have it signed by a union official on a piece of paper that has been run roughshod over in Bk court and which union officials have given away in "negotiations" such as what the IAM did regarding scope for UA's IAM-represented rampers.
what you do, have, Kevin, is far stronger job protections that have been proven to be in the best interests of not only YOU but also the company.
You've been a DL employee since the merger, right? that's coming up on 7 years. your station hasn't been closed.
in far less time than you have been a DL employee, AA and UA have outsourced DOZENS - perhaps SCORES of cities.
so, no, Kev, you don't have a contract that can be torn up and given away because the majority think they are better off by selling the minority down the river - which is what the IAM and TWU have done.
instead, you have a solution that has provided you and your peers with the highest average compensation EVEN WITH THE RR program and a benefits package that exceeds those at AA and UA - and is comparable to UA's.
And don't throw QOL out there as if it is some non-numerical fudge factor that can override everything else. QOL items have a cost not just in a CBA but to the company.
If you could actually show me that a union has delivered something better at your most direct peers, I'd line up in a heartbeat behind your campaign.
but it is precisely because I am PRO DL WORKER that I can't support unionization that would actually lead to lower compensation