I knew when I posted this was a stupid thing to say.
so and avg of 105 flights a day, what is the avg. last year? (I am assuming around 96-98 or so?)
Being up 8ish mainline flights is really not in the big picture. Kev would have to say for sure, but I am willing to bet that would mean nothing for ramp staffing.
(and the only reason why I say that is if we look at like ATL and its up 8% it paints a picture of being up the same amount as SLC when in fact we are talking 8 v 80 flights)
So
since there is really only one hub - ATL where a couple percent increase in flights can really mean a double digit increase in the number of flights - then you can either only be happy when DL pulls another slot swap type transaction that doubled DL's size at LGA, grow in ATL, or accept that a few percent spread across the system is a good thing.
but again, DL isn't growing just a few percent in SLC. growth this month, year over year, is 8%, above DL's average growth in ASMs of 5%.
it's also worth noting that WN is CUTTING the number of flights by using larger aircraft (are they adding any more staff as they switch to larger aircraft?) while AA and UA are not switching regional flying to mainline near as fast as DL is.
You may think that an 8% change in flight activity isn't enough to justify a staffing change - plus or minus - but I can assure you that I know DL well enough that they would not carry a surplus of personnel for an 8% overage on a sustained basis while an 8% increase would indeed result in increased staffing as long as DL intends to maintain that level of activity.
since DL has said that the impacted cargo employees in SLC to be accommodated on the ramp in SLC, the 8% growth is enough to absorb the SLC cargo people.
again, it is no surprise that MEM cargo is being dismantled given that MEM has less cargo capacity than a lot of other stations.
and, once again, you can thank UA for dismantling the idea of its own personnel working in cargo in a trend that DL can't ignore.