Grassroots Efforts at DL for ACS and FAs, no personal attacks.

[robbedagain]

if the LM-2 shows that  then what is the date on that form?  Id be willing to bet if true  it is during the time he worked  not current as is alleged

 

[737823]

if the LM-2 shows that  then what is the date on that form?  Id be willing to bet if true  it is during the time he worked  not current as is alleged

It was filed in March 2014 covering calendar year 2013 when he received approximately $11k from DL 142. He could have received more than that from the district, local and international.

Josh

 

[700UW]

The LM-2 shows that so stop saying you aren't paid by the IAM.

Josh

You cant even read and comprehend, it was for last year, 2013 for the IBT raid, you are truly ignorant.

 

[737823]

You cant even read and comprehend, it was for last year, 2013 for the IBT raid, you are truly ignorant.

Anything else we should know about with 142, other DLs, LLs or the international?

Josh

 

[700UW]

Anything else we should know about with 142, other DLs, LLs or the international?

Josh

Why dont you finally come clean and tell the board what you really do?
 
I have nothing to hide, unlike you.

 

[Kev3188]

He is an organizer for IAM 142

Josh

 
So what if he is?
 
You act like that's something to be ashamed of.

 

[700UW]

I worked the raid that's all and I have stated that numerous times.

When are you going to come clean joshie?

 

[robbedagain]

that's great you did and it shows you are true union     but don't bet on him comin clean 700

 

[southwind]

So...again, how many cards have been signed, out of how many affected employee's, to date?

 

[robbedagain]

Nbr of signed cards will not be released thats almost like asking dl to release private info on employees like urself

 

[Kev3188]

So...again, how many cards have been signed, out of how many affected employee's, to date?

 
More than one, less than 12000...
 

Nbr of signed cards will not be released thats almost like asking dl to release private info on employees like urself

 
They already do, Robbed. 

 

[WorldTraveler]

as required by law?

 

[southwind]

Nbr of signed cards will not be released thats almost like asking dl to release private info on employees like urself

Great! So now I'm already (according to the pro-union gang) working for a company that is not transparent, now let me bring a 3rd party, into the mix, that isn't transparent!
 
My guess, for the IAM not releasing the count so far, is the number isn't looking like rainbows and lollipops !

 

[Kev3188]

as required by law?

Nope.
 
 

Great! So now I'm already (according to the pro-union gang) working for a company that is not transparent, now let me bring a 3rd party, into the mix, that isn't transparent!

Ingenix
PeopleScout
Esis
Sedgwick
Financial Engines


Dude, your surrounded by actual "3rd parties" already.
 

My guess, for the IAM not releasing the count so far, is the number isn't looking like rainbows and lollipops !

Such a ridiculous rabbit hole, even by your standards. Tell ya what; get thee out to the Penguin and tell us what those handing out cards tell you.

You could also speak to the F/A's doing visibility in the terminal.

'Course, that would mean actually getting out of your shop, but still...

 

[WorldTraveler]

perhaps we are talking about two different things but I can absolutely assure you that DL does not give up its employees personal information to any outside source without it being required by law or with your consent.

and DL, just like every other company does provide you with disclosures about how it uses your personal information.

as for those third party companies that you cite, I am sure you are free to tell DL that you don't want them handling your personnel needs and you don't want your personal information passed to them.

OTOH, give it a whirl and let us know how long you wait for your paycheck.