Don't worry robbed, your United moment is coming, compliments of the IAM and Parker, he is just playing nice at the moment, so that he can merge the abomination without as many hiccups...robbedagain said:ok leo the FACT is since AA and US closed the merger, the IAM HAS PICKED UP MORE IN HOUSE WORK for BTW NOW CAN YOU CLEARLY GRASP THAT?? You are flat out wrong . You cant bec youre preciously beloved widget is STILL slamming cities with REDUCTIONS and LAYOFFS Since the merger AA has not layed folks off UNLIKE DL UA is slightly different but Ive already explained that as has other posters on here Clearly you CANNOT UNDERSTAND OR GRASP it bec You are very much ANTI WORKER AND ANTI UNION You can deny it all you want but your posts speak for itself.
No WT, its the product of Delta not giving a crap about its employees and breaking a legal binding contract. You can make all the excuses you want, but its all horse crap.WorldTraveler said:no, dawg, it is the product of a contentious labor -mgmt. environment that leaves employees WORSE OFF than those who have no CBAs. and companies' success in getting their way regardless of whether they screw the employees or not.
Legally they can strike, check out the Norris-LaGaurdia act.700UW said:You still clearly dont understand Section 6, the RLA and Collective Bargaining.
Of course they cant strike, they havent been released into a thirty cooling off period, and the IBT knows this.
Keep up the lies, misinformation and threats, your typical M.O.
^^what he said^^^^Don't worry robbed, your United moment is coming, compliments of the IAM and Parker, he is just playing nice at the moment, so that he can merge the abomination without as many hiccups...
Yeah, i mean thinking a company will comply with a legal binding contract is stupid.WorldTraveler said:yeah, I do get what all the laws say.
What I also get is that airlines have repeatedly run roughshod over their CBAs and then settled grievances for a fraction of what it would have cost if they had coplied in the front.
and DL is doing nothing different than what other airlines or unionized companies do.
The notion that a union is going to force a company to comply is the only laughable part of the whole thing.
^^what he said^^^^