That is correct sir... they (pilots) are going on 7 years without so much as transition agreement... essentially they have been frozen in time. Now keep in mind is the most powerful group on the property, the hardest to outsource, the group with the most leverage.
Why did this happen? Infighting and distrust with their union... they went a step further than Tim wants to go... they ousted their entire union, and created their own! Now they have given up all their leverage in a failed work action... the company has them by the gonads!
What can fleet learn from this? I think it is obvious! there is a huge gap between reality and rhetoric!
I disagree. It wasn't distrust with the union, it was the majority disagreeing with the outcome of a decision in concurrence with the unions policy because they didn't like the result, then a small minority deciding a new union could sidestep the issue, then the same majority being snowed into thinking that would work. USAPA is now simply dragging its feet to prevent what they don't like. It's not distrust at all, it's simply a three year old having a tantrum. Tims motives are a bit less clear. They may be honorable (he really does have some good ideas) or they may be self centered, but he's not simply throwing a fit. At least based on this board (which may not be representative of the workgroup) it's not a minority either. From the posts on this board, speaking in broad terms, with no qualitative analysis (that means I'm making up numbers based on my guess and opinion ;-)), it's probably 35% Occupy, 25% New Direction, 5% the other ticket, and the rest a mix of people that support no particular ticket. Personally I think by and large this board draws those who want change, which in this case favors Tim, but that is just those that speak up. There's probably more ND supporters that don't post then Occupy here, simply because they're either happy or not upset enough to be an 'activist'.