cleardirect
Veteran
- Joined
- May 24, 2008
- Messages
- 6,234
- Reaction score
- 9,749
Not my cavalier dismissal. Those excuses have already been tried in court or in front of the arbitrator. They have failed. So if usapa wnat to use something other than the Nicolau they have to tell the company and the court WHY. You said you had numerous ones.Your cavalier and instant dismissal of the following alone precludes even the possibility of productive discussion:
cleardirect: "Changing seniority to "break the logjam" as Seham tried to argue 4 years ago does not hold up.
A contract will never pass is not a reason."
So are you going to give us a list of LUP WHY usapa wants to change an arbitrated list that has been accepted and found to comply with the policy and rule by the court to be fair?
Or did I use all or your excuses?