I'm glad that this is all over.
A lot of people didn't vote. Mainly from our side, I'll bet. Probably the 287 non voters were also from our side as well.
A lot of us didn't like our IBT contract, and some probably came over to the IAM side. (I voted IAM). But the apathy still lingers.
Its one big change after another. First we vote in the IBT, but no one thought they were going to produce such a bad contract that would galvanize the UA side. The IBT contract wasn't going to fly. I kind of figured that if the UA side held their people, the IBT was going to lose because of our non voters and a lot of non union sentiment on our side. Now we are in the IAM. That's a lot of change for a year and a half to a group that was non union before. But as I said before, we needed a union in the worst way. But a lot of us were worried if we would have went into this merger without a union, we might have been screwed. it has happened before. There are a lot of people on our side who have invested a lot in this campaign. All we can do now is wait and see what happens next. The IAM should at least go to all of the CO stations and talk to us and let us know what to expect in a new contract. What about our OPS people and Move Team people. Where do they fit in a new IAM contract? And get a steward structure process in place. WE have some people on our side that were IBT stewards. Will the be invited as IBT stewards? I know that the IAM will have to finish its business with the UA side, but please don't forget about us. (Like you did in 2009 - Still there are some hard feelings about that campaign.) Now the hard feelings need to be patched up and lets work together for an industry leading contract. Ill be watching, listening, and will be involved to the best of my ability.
A lot of people didn't vote. Mainly from our side, I'll bet. Probably the 287 non voters were also from our side as well.
A lot of us didn't like our IBT contract, and some probably came over to the IAM side. (I voted IAM). But the apathy still lingers.
Its one big change after another. First we vote in the IBT, but no one thought they were going to produce such a bad contract that would galvanize the UA side. The IBT contract wasn't going to fly. I kind of figured that if the UA side held their people, the IBT was going to lose because of our non voters and a lot of non union sentiment on our side. Now we are in the IAM. That's a lot of change for a year and a half to a group that was non union before. But as I said before, we needed a union in the worst way. But a lot of us were worried if we would have went into this merger without a union, we might have been screwed. it has happened before. There are a lot of people on our side who have invested a lot in this campaign. All we can do now is wait and see what happens next. The IAM should at least go to all of the CO stations and talk to us and let us know what to expect in a new contract. What about our OPS people and Move Team people. Where do they fit in a new IAM contract? And get a steward structure process in place. WE have some people on our side that were IBT stewards. Will the be invited as IBT stewards? I know that the IAM will have to finish its business with the UA side, but please don't forget about us. (Like you did in 2009 - Still there are some hard feelings about that campaign.) Now the hard feelings need to be patched up and lets work together for an industry leading contract. Ill be watching, listening, and will be involved to the best of my ability.