Maybe the company announcing getting rid of 3 757's is part of their re-negotiating the leases of those aircraft. They couldn't get the rate they wanted so they publically announce them leaving the fleet. Just like if we didn't accept concessions, the company would close down. Who knows? For the company, if replacements are not readily available, what would be the difference between the extra cost for more expensive leases versus the lost revenue of those 3 aircraft actually leaving. Above my pay grade I guess (but being currently furloughed, I guess everything is 🙂
If the lessor is saying market rates are now higher, I would guess other 757's to replace them would also be higher. As for the lessor, I would think they would rather keep the planes at US Air if they can get a better rate. Otherwise they would have to perform maint. and/or modifications and also paint the aircraft. Probably several months of down time which equates to those aircraft producing no income for the lessor. Time will tell...
If the lessor is saying market rates are now higher, I would guess other 757's to replace them would also be higher. As for the lessor, I would think they would rather keep the planes at US Air if they can get a better rate. Otherwise they would have to perform maint. and/or modifications and also paint the aircraft. Probably several months of down time which equates to those aircraft producing no income for the lessor. Time will tell...